“…A 2012 report on the uses of RJ by police, probation and youth offending teams in six counties in the UK revealed some further concerns, including 'widespread inconsistency in the implementation of RJ initiatives across the whole criminal justice system, with conflicting terminology and a lack of understanding of the principles of RJ' (Criminal Justice Joint Inspection, 2012:11). In sum, research on police-led RJ in the UK has found that as RJ for low-level offences is up to the discretion of, and facilitated by, individual officers, when their understanding of RJ is lacking, then this is evidenced in their practice (Shapland, Crawford, Gray & Burn, 2017;Cutress, 2015;Stockdale, 2015;Criminal Justice Joint Inspection, 2012). At its worst, this may include net-widening (Criminal Justice Joint Inspection, 2012;O'Mahony and Doak, 2004) and ignoring the 'voluntary' aspect of RJ (Shapland et al, 2017: 22).…”