2014
DOI: 10.1080/02255189.2014.899894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policies in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: dominance or diversity?

Abstract: Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) were introduced in 1999 by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund as a requirement for Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPCs) to gain access to debt relief and concessional loans. They signalled a new focus by including a participatory framework of "nationally driven" policies. Employing 81 PRSPs for 58 countries, published during 2000-2008, this paper develops a unique scorecard to evaluate the alignment of policies in PRSPs with three dominant development pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Country proposals for compact funding were often informed by or directly based on Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs). PRSPs’ policy content represented a continuation of Washington Consensus and structural adjustment thinking but also embodied the development finance community’s transition towards a new poverty‐reduction agenda (sometimes referred to as the “New York Consensus”) that included a proactive role for civil society in the planning process and the state in pro‐poor investment (Battaile & Kayizzi‐Mugerwa, 2005; Cheru, 2006; Elkins & Feeny, 2014; Komives & Dijkstra, 2009; Sumner, 2006). Among the MCC’s first 19 compacts, 13 had some basis in PRSPs.…”
Section: Research Context Design and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Country proposals for compact funding were often informed by or directly based on Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs). PRSPs’ policy content represented a continuation of Washington Consensus and structural adjustment thinking but also embodied the development finance community’s transition towards a new poverty‐reduction agenda (sometimes referred to as the “New York Consensus”) that included a proactive role for civil society in the planning process and the state in pro‐poor investment (Battaile & Kayizzi‐Mugerwa, 2005; Cheru, 2006; Elkins & Feeny, 2014; Komives & Dijkstra, 2009; Sumner, 2006). Among the MCC’s first 19 compacts, 13 had some basis in PRSPs.…”
Section: Research Context Design and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bebbington et al (2007) show that the World Bank often endorses PRSPs that follow neoliberal principles. Elkins and Feeny (2014) also question the World Bank's declaration on applying the participation and ownership principles in its PRSPs. Therefore, it appears that the World Bank still retains its power when consulting recipient governments.…”
Section: Critiques Of Colonialism Imperialism and Neo-colonialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many financial products and services are formed by microfinance that has made it possible for the people of low-income to turn out to be clients of a banking mediator. Aligning to quality of life, poverty reduction is an essential feature of global economic development policy (Elkins and Feeny, 2014). Despite substantial growth in global economic output in last 50 years, wealth disparities between regions and within countries have increased significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%