Policies to Avoid Cost Overruns in Infrastructure Projects: Critical Evaluation and Recommendations

Abstract

Many infrastructure projects have cost overruns and there has been a lot of research both on why these cost overruns occur and what can be done to reduce hem. Bent Flyvbjerg is the leading researcher in the area and in this article his proposals are used as the starting point. Besides a literature review, a questionnaire was sent out to experienced Swedish project managers to find out what they thought could reduce cost overruns. The literature review and the questionnaire were the foundation for the proposals formulated in this article. Proposals concerned three areas: (1). Organisational macro-structure, e.g. using more PPP projects but also decentralisation of budgets where cost overruns in one project in a region lead to less alternative projects in the specific region. (2). Organisational quality: It should be easy to see when and where cost overruns occur and who was responsible. There should be a well-developed knowledge management system in the organisation and an organisation culture of openness with a focus on improvements. (3). Organisational processes, e.g. a systematic use of external reviewers in different stages of a project. Keywords: Cost overruns, Infrastructure projects, Policy measures

Evaluation of compliance of concreting materials to standards in building projects in Lagos State, Nigeria

“…The effects of non-compliance with national standards have significantly depleted the effectiveness of the Nigerian construction industry. Lind and Brunes (2014) reported that non-compliance of construction materials and processes to standards in the public sector leads to extra cost and waste of time in procurement. Dei (2016) identified the effects of non-compliance with national standards on building project delivery to include accidents on site, loss of lives, decrease in productivity, project delay, and excess expenditure in the form of compensation.…”

“…Reworks are necessitated by poor performance, which in the first instance, is evidence of non-compliance with standards. The high ranking of rework cost reflects its financial implications, which Lind and Brunes (2014) found as an effect of non-compliance with the standard that lead to cost overrun and project delay. Project delivery behind schedule also ranked high, presumably because of extra time needed to remedy defects resulting from the use of sub-standard materials.…”

Compliance within a Regulatory Framework in Implementing Public Road Construction Projects

“…A lack of compliance was reported in the construction public sector that resulted in extra cost and wasted time in procurement (Lind and Brunes, 2014). Examples include; poor implementation plans, substandard work, a high contract price, variations and schedule overruns in the construction and engineering industry (Golden and Picci, 2006;Ramanathan, Narayanan and Idrus, 2012).…”

Adapting for Inertia: Delivering Large Government ICT Projects in Australia and New Zealand

“…There is a focus on the Australian and New Zealand public sectors as there is a gap in targeted research on the institutional governance of large ICT software projects across these sectors. While there is much research on large ICT projects, it tends to concentrate on a specific theme-for example, the impacts of project roles and disciplines (Crawford & Helm 2009;Williams & Samset 2010;Kwak et al 2014;Joslin & Müller 2015;Kloppenborg & Tesch 2015;Flyvbjerg et al 2016;APM 2018;Marcusson 2018; AIPM & KPMG 2022)-or it is international (IPA 2018), related to a particular Australian or New Zealand jurisdiction or project (Gershon 2008;KPMG 2012;OCIO 2013;Shergold 2015; Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2018b), investigates projects in general rather than ICT specifically (Dobbs et al 2013;Lind & Brunes 2014;Siemiatycki 2015) or a particular project approach (Hodgkinson 2019), is related to public policy and its application (Wanna 2007(Wanna , 2021McConnell 2015), or to governance in general (Edwards et al 2012).…”