2010
DOI: 10.1891/1946-6560.1.2.200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policing Domestic Violence: The Significance of Charging in the Post-Arrest Decision Making of Police Officers

Abstract: During the 1980s many state legislatures enacted laws to address domestic violence cases, including mandatory arrest and warrantless arrest in a misdemeanor domestic violence incident. The domestic violence arrest decision has been extensively examined, but this is not the final decision point for officers. This research examined police officers’ decisions when listing criminal charges in domestic violence incidents. Using a vignette research design, data come from 267 police officers in a large department. Mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, research indicates organizational policies influence arrest decisions. There is a small body of literature regarding police arrest discretion in domestic violence cases (Phillips & Gillham, 2010; Sun, 2007; Trujillo & Ross, 2008), and this study did not directly query law enforcement officers about their child abuse charging decisions and discretion in domestic violence cases. In addition, studies indicate officers’ charging actions may influence the prosecution of the domestic violence incident, and in some cases, “No Drop” prosecutorial policies may influence police charging decisions (see Wooldredge & Thistlethwaite, 2005; Worrall, Ross, & McCord, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, research indicates organizational policies influence arrest decisions. There is a small body of literature regarding police arrest discretion in domestic violence cases (Phillips & Gillham, 2010; Sun, 2007; Trujillo & Ross, 2008), and this study did not directly query law enforcement officers about their child abuse charging decisions and discretion in domestic violence cases. In addition, studies indicate officers’ charging actions may influence the prosecution of the domestic violence incident, and in some cases, “No Drop” prosecutorial policies may influence police charging decisions (see Wooldredge & Thistlethwaite, 2005; Worrall, Ross, & McCord, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the end, this study fills a large gap regarding child abuse charging in domestic violence incidents and should serve as a platform for future research into police decision making and the enmeshment of child abuse and domestic violence. There is ample research that investigates police discretion in domestic violence cases (Finn & Bettis, 2006; Finn, Blackwell, Stalans, Studdard, & Dugan, 2004; Phillips & Gillham, 2010; Sun, 2007), and research should draw on these findings. Understanding the circumstances of law enforcement child abuse charging decisions is essential as they are often the first responders to domestic violence and, in some cases, child abuse; they may serve as a crucial point of intervention in the overlap of domestic violence and child abuse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite mandatory arrest laws, police retain some discretion in domestic violence arrest decisions. The police decision-making literature indicates that law enforcement officers may experience an internal conflict between mandatory arrest polices and their personal internal decision-making processes (Phillips and Gillham, 2010), and in spite of the preferred arrest policies, they retain a considerable amount of police discretion (Sun, 2007). Additional research has documented several factors external to the IPV incident that can influence an officer's decision to arrest.…”
Section: Police Discretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars have examined the implementation of a new policy or program in criminal justice generally and the police specifically. These studies, however, tended to focus on the street-level officer and their implementation of department program (Lurigio and Skogan, 1994) or state law (Eitle, 2005;Mastrofski et al, 1987;Phillips and Gillham, 2010).…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%