Bodyâworn cameras may produce varying effects on police behavior, depending on the agencyâspecific accountability context in which the technology adoption is embedded. The cameras may encourage coercive police actions when acquired to incentivize performance, such as by protecting officers from false complaints. By contrast, when acquired to enhance procedural accountability, such as by enabling closer scrutiny of officer misconduct, the cameras may discourage coercive police actions. Based on this framework, this study examined the case of the New Orleans Police Department, an agency that implemented a bodyâworn camera program to enhance both performance and procedural accountability. Results of Bayesian structural timeâseries modeling with synthetic control show that the program increased the number of investigatory stops and followâup measures (i.e., frisk, search, citation, arrest) while decreasing the ratio of moreâtoâless coercive measures during stops (i.e., arrest/citationâtoâwarning ratio and searchâtoâfrisk ratio). However, the program had a null effect on the minorityâtoâWhite suspect ratio, despite the agency's biasâfree policing initiative. The percentage of frisks and searches detecting drugs or weapons also declined. A broader implication of the findings is that technologyâbased monitoring mechanisms are important, but not a silver bullet for improving the behavior of streetâlevel bureaucrats.