Policing Race: The Racial Stratification of Searches in Police Traffic Stops*

Abstract

Research on race effects in police traffic stops is theoretically underdeveloped. In this study, we derive propositions from Donald Black's theory of law to explain the interaction effects of officer and driver race on searches in traffic stops in St. Louis, Missouri. Our citywide results and those for stops in predominantly White communities are generally consistent with the theory: Searches are more likely in stops of Black drivers than in those of White drivers, especially by White officers, controlling for other characteristics of the officer, driver, and stop. In predominantly Black communities, however, stops of White drivers by White officers are most likely to result in a search. We interpret both sets of results as manifestations of racial profiling in segregated communities and suggest that Black's theory of law remains a promising theoretical framework for future research on the continuing significance of racebased policing in the United States.Although a burgeoning research literature examines the characteristics and consequences of police traffic stops, most of this research is either

Police Stop-and-Frisk Practices: An Examination of Factors That Affect Officers' Decisions to Initiate a Stop-and-Frisk Police Procedure

“…The logistic regression analysis in this study measured the effect of 11 different variables on an officer's decision to initiate a frisk procedure after the initial stop for questioning was initiated by the police. Overall, the findings are consistent with prior studies (Gelman et al, 2007;Rojek, Rosenfeld, & Decker, 2012), which indicate that policing is selective in terms of who gets stopped and frisked and who does not. The analyses in this study show that Black suspects were 1.68 times more likely to be frisked by the police after being stopped for questioning compared with White suspects.…”

Producing race disparities: A study of drug arrests across place and race*

“…Their unifying premise acknowledges a race‐based power structure in which Whites mobilize social control when they perceive threats to their political, economic, or social dominance from nondominant groups. In a voluminous literature, scholars have reported empirical support for racial conflict theories, revealing that, net of other factors, the relative size of nondominant racial groups predicts a range of policing outcomes: traffic stops, pedestrian stops, frisks, searches, arrests, discrimination, and police use of violence (Eitle & Monahan, ; Fagan & Davies, ; Gaston, ; Kane, ; Parker, Stults, & Rice, ; Rojek, Rosenfeld, & Decker, ; Smith & Holmes, ; Stewart, Baumer, Brunson, & Simons, ). It follows, then, that long‐standing, unwarranted race disparities in drug arrests reflect efforts to curtail perceived threats to the status quo and to subordinate people and communities of color.…”

Selection in Border Areas: Profiling Immigrants or Crimmigrants?

“…Third, as race and ethnicity were linked to nationality and nationality subsequently linked to crime, this boils down to 'if you do not look Dutch, you must be a risk'. Although the concept of race is not commonly used in the Netherlands, these findings tie in with a very vast international literature on policing and ethnic or racial profiling (Carroll and Gonzalez 2014;Delsol and Shiner 2015;Rojek, Rosenfeld and Decker 2012;Tillyer and Engel 2013;). On a first glance it would be easy to attribute these observations solely to the beliefs of the individual officers.…”