Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research

Abstract

KEYWORDSautomated driving; first, second, and third order impacts; policy and societal implications; ripple effect ABSTRACTIn this paper, the potential effects of automated driving that are relevant to policy and society are explored, findings discussed in literature about those effects are reviewed and areas for future research are identified. The structure of our review is based on the ripple effect concept, which represents the implications of automated vehicles at three different stages: first-order (traffic, travel cost, and travel choices), second-order (vehicle ownership and sharing, location choices and land use, and transport infrastructure), and third-order (energy consumption, air pollution, safety, social equity, economy, and public health). Our review shows that first-order impacts on road capacity, fuel efficiency, emissions, and accidents risk are expected to be beneficial. The magnitude of these benefits will likely increase with the level of automation and cooperation and with the penetration rate of these systems. The synergistic effects between vehicle automation, sharing, and electrification can multiply these benefits. However, studies confirm that automated vehicles can induce additional travel demand because of more and longer vehicle trips. Potential land use changes have not been included in these estimations about excessive travel demand. Other third-order benefits on safety, economy, public health and social equity still remain unclear. Therefore, the balance between the short-term benefits and long-term impacts of vehicle automation remains an open question.

Sustainable Accessibility and the Implementation of Automated Vehicles: Identifying Critical Decisions

“…In these publications, the use of analytical approaches and simulation models to qualitatively or quantitatively assess isolated impacts is reported. Studies of this type have explored, for example, environmental impacts or user benefits (see [7] for a complete literature review). Publications that analyse the broader implications of AVs constitute the second type.…”

“…When considering the impacts of AVs, most publications tend to address only a few issues while paying little attention to whether these impacts might have mutually countered, cumulative, or synergistic effects. With some exceptions (such as [5][6][7]) reports that provide a more holistic approach are rare. This is problematic as a delay in co-creating a critical and transdisciplinary understanding about AVs might precipitate the emergence of the negative side of this technology.…”

How Can Autonomous and Connected Vehicles, Electromobility, BRT, Hyperloop, Shared Use Mobility and Mobility-As-A-Service Shape Transport Futures for the Context of Smart Cities?

“…Combining CAVs with electromobility concepts, making these vehicles more inexpensive to use in environmental, economic and social terms would improve their energy consumption efficiency and cost-effectiveness. As [19] explicitly suggests the synergistic effects between vehicle automation, sharing, and electrification can multiply the benefits associated with those three transport initiatives.…”

The Enemy of Good: Estimating the Cost of Waiting for Nearly Perfect Automated Vehicles

“…Based on the estimates of the safety benefits of driver assistance systems described in Chapter Two, we allow for up to a 50-percent decrease in the longterm fatality rates of non-HAVs. However, it is also possible that fatality rates could increase if the safety benefit of these technologies is outpaced by a decline in driver attentiveness and skill (which will still be essential for non-HAV driving) or other maladaptive behaviors (Milakis, van Arem, and van Wee, 2017). Therefore, we allow for a 10-percent increase in non-HAV fatality rates relative to the benchmark rate.…”