2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57351-9_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy Conflict Resolution in IoT via Planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the authors of [58] presented a game theory model for mutual intrusion detection in IoT, aiding nodes in decisionmaking. Similarly, [59] introduced a conflict resolution scheme for IoT services, using a semantic policy structure and soft constraints to address multi-service disputes.…”
Section: Security Requirements Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the authors of [58] presented a game theory model for mutual intrusion detection in IoT, aiding nodes in decisionmaking. Similarly, [59] introduced a conflict resolution scheme for IoT services, using a semantic policy structure and soft constraints to address multi-service disputes.…”
Section: Security Requirements Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [ 104 ], the authors represent a scheme for resolving disputes between IoT-based services by redefining conflict resolution as a planning problem. They establish a semantic policy structure for IoT-based conflict identification and allow soft constraints to settle conflicts resulting from multiple services.…”
Section: Taxonomy Of Ml-based Aa For Iotmentioning
confidence: 99%