Policy instruments and barriers to rural tourism development – a case study of cluster in the Liptov touristic region in Slovakia

Abstract

Tourism industry, in general, and rural tourism specifically is often promoted as a go-to solution to the various problems that rural regions and communities are currently facing. In Slovakia, several policies have been formulated and implemented in order to harness this potential in reality. The main aim of this contribution is to (via an in-depth case study of a tourism cluster in Liptov region in Slovakia) find out the current state of the policy instruments being implemented to promote the development of rural tourism as well as barriers that hinder the effectiveness of said instruments. By means of questionnaire survey and interviews with relevant stakeholders (accommodation providers, representatives of local self-government and support organizations at the local and regional level) we identified both financial and institutional hurdles, but also a difference in opinions of different actors concerned.

Agritourism and local products in terms of protection and sustainable development of the Carpathians: a participatory discussion on key issues and challenges

“…The well-preserved, unique natural environment and cultural heritage of the Carpathian Mountains show the potential to develop sustainable tourism and agritourism (Ciolac et al, 2019;Morea et al, 2019;Mura & Kljucnikov, 2018;Szpara, 2011;Vîntu et al, 2016). Issues related to rural tourism, including agritourism in the Carpathians, are most often presented using examples from the Romanian Carpathians (Ciolac et al, 2019;Morea et al, 2019;Morea et al, 2020;Turnock, 1999Turnock, , 2002Vîntu et al, 2016), the Polish Carpathians (Bajgier-Kowalska & Tracz, 2019;Baum, 2011;Durydiwka, 2012Durydiwka, , 2013Kubal & Mika, 2012;Szpara, 2011), less often the Slovak Carpathians (Melichová & Majstríková, 2017;Melichová et al, 2018;Mura & Kljucnikov, 2018) and the Ukrainian Carpathians (Kudla & Hamkalo, 2011;Przezbórska-Skobiej & Kudla, 2017).…”

Prioritizing the barriers to tourism growth in rural India: an integrated multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach

“…The removal of economic and political barriers and providing adequate infrastructure that improved the accessibility to rural areas are among other factors that support the growth of rural tourism (Ana-Elia et al , 2018; Wijesundara and Ranasinghe, 2019). Melichová et al (2018) found that accommodation providers' unavailability in local areas, representatives at the regional level, are significant hurdles for rural tourism development.…”

What Drives the Private Innovation in Rural Areas? In-Depth Case Study of Slovak Rural Region

“…The second concept highlights entrepreneurial activities that pull local resources to create value added in a business, deeply rooted in the setup of rural space. Actually, the spatial aspect of rural entrepreneurship plays crucial role (Melichová et al 2018a), as space involves enhancing the creation of value added, putting value into local existing resources and developing of quality of life in specific rural areas (Müller et al 2015). Thus, rural entrepreneur is locally embedded entrepreneur, that formed enterprise in order to utilize local resources (Jašková 2019), and often, also in order to solve specific local problems (Melichová et al 2018b), support the development processes in the locality and generate new employment opportunities (Hoy 1983).…”