2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-94273-1_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy Instruments for High-Growth Enterprises

Abstract: High-Growth Enterprises (HGEs) have received growing interest from entrepreneurship scholars, the business press, and of course policymakers. HGEs can potentially make large contributions to economic growth, which has led to various policy initiatives. This chapter discusses the main topics surrounding policy interventions for HGEs, including a discussion of the various rationales for policy interventions. We next discuss the many areas that relate to possible HGE policy instruments. We then evaluate some prev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite their better performance in general, the relatively stronger negative adjustments to the shock should be alarming, and specific policy interventions focusing on investment should be implemented. In particular, risksharing instruments, such as guarantees and equity or quasi-equity financing are among the best fit for HGEs and R&D companies (Coad et al, 2022b). There is also considerable evidence that innovative start-up/ scale-up firms (corresponding to all categories of young and small firms, HGEs and R&D investors and non-subsidiary firms) need alternative financing solutions beyond traditional bank finance, and further development of the venture debt and venture capital markets in Europe would boost these firms, providing a helping hand during the shock and preventing negative adjustments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their better performance in general, the relatively stronger negative adjustments to the shock should be alarming, and specific policy interventions focusing on investment should be implemented. In particular, risksharing instruments, such as guarantees and equity or quasi-equity financing are among the best fit for HGEs and R&D companies (Coad et al, 2022b). There is also considerable evidence that innovative start-up/ scale-up firms (corresponding to all categories of young and small firms, HGEs and R&D investors and non-subsidiary firms) need alternative financing solutions beyond traditional bank finance, and further development of the venture debt and venture capital markets in Europe would boost these firms, providing a helping hand during the shock and preventing negative adjustments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand this point, two dimensions are useful for placing EBPs within a broader set of public policies: the time horizon and the policy objective. Many public policies may have the indirect objective of increasing exports in the medium or long term 3 (see also Coad et al 2022;Bloom et al 2019), however, EBPs are short-term in nature, have the immediate goal of increasing exports of target firms in the short-run, and typically include the words "exports" or "foreign market" in their title and description. International trade theories (e.g.…”
Section: The Position Of Export Boosting Policies In a Wider Set Of P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in their reviews,Bloom et al (2019) andCoad et al (2022), suggest ways to increase innovation and indirectly exports in medium to long run by reforming intellectual property law, designing tax incentives for patents (i.e. patent box), improving education system, increasing the number of individuals trained in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, increasing skilled immigration, improving labour market regulation, firm competition and trade openness, R&D policy, national mission-oriented R&D projects, public procurement policy (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In stark contrast to the rapid expansion of the industry, there is always a shortage of relevant talents in the market at present. There are only 67,900 technically skilled talents in China with the ability to promote the application of blockchain technology, products, and services on the ground, and most of them are transferred from the Internet, software, IT services, and other fields [ 174 ]. The contradiction between the supply and demand of talents is outstanding.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%