2014
DOI: 10.5897/ajar2013.8122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy interventions and public expenditure reform for pro-poor agricultural development in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The education level per capita, the level of infrastructure, and the change of economic system all promote IGG of cities. In addition, agricultural financial subsidies can alleviate farmers' poverty [ 72 ]. Therefore, we use the ratio of urban fiscal expenditure to regional GDP as the proxy variable of government intervention (gove) and explore its relationship with IGGE.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Igg and Plausible Explanatory Variables F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The education level per capita, the level of infrastructure, and the change of economic system all promote IGG of cities. In addition, agricultural financial subsidies can alleviate farmers' poverty [ 72 ]. Therefore, we use the ratio of urban fiscal expenditure to regional GDP as the proxy variable of government intervention (gove) and explore its relationship with IGGE.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Igg and Plausible Explanatory Variables F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R 2 value of 0.80 shows that, 80% of the variations in the trend of budget allocation to agriculture during the military regime are explained by time. This is consistent with the findings of Olowa and Olowa (2014) who observed that budget allocations to agriculture have remained unnecessarily constant over the years.…”
Section: Budget Allocation Growth Rates and Direction To Agriculture ...supporting
confidence: 92%
“…In other words, all attempts made by every successive administration and foreign donor agencies to lessen poverty in Nigeria proved abortive [9]. Over 70% of the people living in abject poverty in Nigeria reside in the rural areas where agriculture is still at a microscopic scale [10], followed by numerous limitations inhibiting it from addressing the issue of poverty and food security. Thus, most poor people comprising small scale farmers live from hand to mouth due to their inability to turn out farm produce in commercial quantities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%