Policy‐Into‐Practice for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Randomized Controlled Trial and Cohort Study of E‐Learning Targeting Improved Physiotherapy Management

Abstract

Objective. To examine the effectiveness of a physiotherapy-specific, web-based e-learning platform, "RAP-el," in bestpractice management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using a single-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) and prospective cohort study. Methods. Australian-registered physiotherapists were electronically randomized into intervention and control groups. The intervention group accessed RAP-eL over 4 weeks. Change in self-reported confidence in knowledge and skills was compared between groups at the end of the RCT using linear regression conditioned for baseline scores by a blinded assessor, using intent-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included physiotherapists' satisfaction with RA management and responses to RA-relevant clinical statements and practice-relevant vignettes. Retention was evaluated in a cohort study 8 weeks after the RCT. Results. Eighty physiotherapists were randomized into the intervention and 79 into the control groups. Fifty-six and 48, respectively, provided baseline data. Significant between-group differences were observed for change in confidence in knowledge (mean difference 8.51; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 6.29, 10.73; effect size 1.62) and skills (mean difference 7.26; 95% CI 5.1, 9.4; effect size 1.54), with the intervention group performing better. Satisfaction in ability to manage RA, 4 of the 6 clinical statements, and responses to vignettes demonstrated significant improvement in the intervention group. Although 8-week scores showed declines in most outcomes, their clinical significance remains uncertain. Conclusion. RAP-eL can improve self-reported confidence, likely practice behaviors and satisfaction in physiotherapists' ability to manage people with RA, and improve their clinical knowledge in several areas of best-practice RA management in the short term.

Models of Care for musculoskeletal health: Moving towards meaningful implementation and evaluation across conditions and care settings

“…Evaluation can be undertaken at the level of specific components of MoCs (e.g. strategies to build workforce capacity in skills and knowledge to deliver best MSK care[43,45,47]); evaluation of implementation of MoCs at a system-wide programmatic level (e.g. an osteoarthritis care program[48]); and the evaluation ofMoCs at a system-wide level (e.g.…”

The Effects of Health Promotion Model on Preventive Behaviors of Osteoporosis during Premenopausal Period in Employed Women: A Quasi-experimental Study

“…Amini et al stated that there is a certain relationship between perceived benefits and quitting smoking among the youth (23). In addition, in Australia, Fary et al stated that there was a significant relationship between perceived benefits and physical activities (24). Sharifirad et al revealed that by reducing perceived barriers, fewer teens started smoking (25).…”

Confidence and Attitudes Toward Osteoarthritis Care Among the Current and Emerging Health Workforce: A Multinational Interprofessional Study

“…Self‐rated confidence in OA management knowledge and clinical skills were measured using a customized battery of items based on a tool previously developed to measure the constructs in RA care . In the original tool, items were derived from a critical appraisal of RA clinical guidelines and an international Delphi study .…”

“…In the original tool, items were derived from a critical appraisal of RA clinical guidelines and an international Delphi study . Adequate measurement properties have been established for the tool, which has been applied in a clinical trial . For the current study, items from the original tool that were not RA‐specific and could be reasonably translated to OA care were retained (eg, principles of nonpharmacologic care, principles of chronic disease self‐management, application of diagnostic criteria, outcomes tools).…”