2016
DOI: 10.1515/pr-2016-0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Politeness in ancient Rome: Can it help us evaluate modern politeness theories?

Abstract: This paper takes four frameworks for understanding linguistic politeness (Brown and Levinson, Watts, Terkourafi, Hall) and tests each on the same corpus to see whether they yield results that are useful and/or in keeping with the other information we have about the material. The corpus used consists of 661 polite requests made in letters by a single Roman author, Cicero. The results demonstrate first that politeness theories are helpful as explanatory tools even in dealing with very well-known material, and se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Journal of Language and Education,8(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.11859 Recived: Dec 12, 2020Accepted: Mar 01, 2022Published: Mar 31, 2022 PAVEL DURYAGIN, MARIA FOKINA However, the scope of studies in pragmatics has widened significantly over recent decades, as typologically different languages are increasingly being investigated; see, for example, a detailed review of pragmatic studies in Eastern languages in (Chen, 2010) and successful application of Brown and Levinson's theory in several recent case studies (Chen et al, 2013;Dickey, 2016;Kiyama et al, 2012). We aim to continue this trend by examining evidence from Russian, a language that is relatively understudied within the mainstream framework of cross-cultural and interlanguage pragmatics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Journal of Language and Education,8(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.11859 Recived: Dec 12, 2020Accepted: Mar 01, 2022Published: Mar 31, 2022 PAVEL DURYAGIN, MARIA FOKINA However, the scope of studies in pragmatics has widened significantly over recent decades, as typologically different languages are increasingly being investigated; see, for example, a detailed review of pragmatic studies in Eastern languages in (Chen, 2010) and successful application of Brown and Levinson's theory in several recent case studies (Chen et al, 2013;Dickey, 2016;Kiyama et al, 2012). We aim to continue this trend by examining evidence from Russian, a language that is relatively understudied within the mainstream framework of cross-cultural and interlanguage pragmatics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the formulation of speech acts will be investigated in relation to their position within an interaction (Section 5) as described by Conversational 1 Cabrillana (2016) combines pragmatics with a sociolinguistic approach to all directive subtypes in one comedy. For studies on Latin requests, see Dickey (2012Dickey ( , 2016. According to Unceta Gómez (2018: 13), the directive speech acts are a quintessence of face-threatening acts (see Section 3) and, hence, they are a core issue for the im/politeness studies also in Classical languages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dickey (2016) incorporates four different frameworks for understanding linguistic politeness(Brown and Levinson, Watts, Terkouraki and Hall) and concludes that, far from being exclusive, it is possible to integrate all four for a better interpretation of the data in Latin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%