2014
DOI: 10.5539/elt.v7n11p159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Politeness Strategies in Thai Graduate Research Paper Discussions: Implications for Second/Foreign Language Academic Writing

Abstract: This paper investigates the use of politeness strategies in 32 discussion sections of research papers produced by Thai graduate students at Graduate School of Language and Communication, National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA), Bangkok, Thailand. The study reported in this paper adopts Brown and Levinson's (1978Levinson's ( , 1987 and Myers' (1989) models of politeness strategies. The project as a whole aims to identify what politeness strategies are most commonly used in the whole corpus, whet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of literature reviews were conducted, research on language politeness was conducted by. Research conducted by [2]) in Thailand reveals that someone who asks politely will tend to get polite answers to the questions they ask. These findings support the statement [3] in Canada.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of literature reviews were conducted, research on language politeness was conducted by. Research conducted by [2]) in Thailand reveals that someone who asks politely will tend to get polite answers to the questions they ask. These findings support the statement [3] in Canada.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of textual and interpersonal subcategories demonstrates that transition markers and hedges are the most predominant metadiscourse features in New Zealand and Thai theses and make the largest contribution to the density of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse in this study. The heavy use of the two subcategories in thesis writing is similar to Mirshamsi and Allami's (2013) knowledge that research writing, particularly in discussion and conclusion parts, is more than presenting certain facts but also opinions or unproved justification towards key findings (Ädel & Erman, 2012;Getkham 2014;Hyland, 2004). The hedging strategy can be seen as a cautious way in which novice research students show their attempt to give plausible reasons for their findings and also their awareness of some limitations restraining them not to overstate the findings and reasoning.…”
Section: Chapter Summarymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The academic writing instruction in this context only focuses on textual features, coherence and cohesion, leading to Thai teachers' and students' greater familiarity with the concept of coherence and cohesion than interpersonal features in academic writing. Moreover, Thai students have been taught to write academic texts like research articles and theses in a very formal and impersonal way but are rarely taught to politely engage with readers in the texts (Getkham, 2014). The Thai informants mentioned that even though some students are conscious that it is more acceptable than in the past to include interpersonal features such as self-mentions and engagement markers in academic texts, they still favour the traditional style of academic writing because they are concerned that other readers who take a traditional approach to writing may find such interpersonal markers inappropriate to be included in the theses.…”
Section: Chapter Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations