2003
DOI: 10.1080/1343900032000117231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Change Reopening the Asimilasi vs Integrasi Debate: Ethnic Chinese Identity in Post-Suharto Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This abrupt fallout along ethnic lines was dramatic in a variety of ways for many Chinese Indonesians. The severity of the anger that was directed towards the Chinese during the riots was a shock to many, and especially for a number of young Chinese born in Indonesia who had been educated in and had spoken Bahasa all their lives, for whom the very idea of 'being Chinese' was entirely new (Purdey, 2003).…”
Section: Changing Chinese Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This abrupt fallout along ethnic lines was dramatic in a variety of ways for many Chinese Indonesians. The severity of the anger that was directed towards the Chinese during the riots was a shock to many, and especially for a number of young Chinese born in Indonesia who had been educated in and had spoken Bahasa all their lives, for whom the very idea of 'being Chinese' was entirely new (Purdey, 2003).…”
Section: Changing Chinese Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No longer is Chinese Indonesian identity defined by pembauron (enforced assimilation). Instead, debates concerning the role of this community in the greater Indonesian society (such as the assimilation versus integration debate of the 1940s and 1950s) have begun to resurface (Purdey, 2003; see also numerous articles in Jakarta Post 1998. Many Chinese who had begun the effort to merge into the broader national fabric of Indonesia, particularly during the pre-1998 period of economic growth, are now redirecting their actions.…”
Section: Changing Chinese Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In return, Malays were guaranteed special rights in areas of language, religion, education and civil service, as well as the status of the Malay rulers (Suhana, 2012). It is important to note, while neighbouring countries like Indonesia and Thailand adopted assimilation as the way to develop their national identities (see Hoon, 2006;Purdey, 2003;Suryadinata et al, 2003), Malaysia took the contrasting approach to integrate various ethnic groups and allowing them to maintain their identities (Chua, 2009). The 13 May incidence in 1969 was a major turning point to Malaysia.…”
Section: Nation-building In Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be seen in the inaction of the Chinese government toward the atrocities committed toward ethnic Chinese communities in Indonesia in 1998 and the nationalist backlashes against Beijing. 65 The Jiang Zemin government was heavily criticized by domestic netizens as weak and cowardly for forsaking the lives of innocent overseas Chinese in Indonesia. 66 Indeed, ever since that time, the Chinese government has increasingly become more vocal in supporting overseas Chinese communities, although it has spent much of its diplomatic energy on PRC citizens residing abroad, as we can see through a few cases of overseas evacuations in East Timor and Libya.…”
Section: The Overseas Chinese Issue and Domestic Nationalism Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%