1969
DOI: 10.2307/2009642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Cleavages and Party Systems

Abstract: The field of the comparative study of political party systems has been particularly fortunate to have been the focus of quite a number of substantial scholarly team efforts in recent years. Individual case studies are still appearing that follow Robert A. Dahl's model of the “patterns of opposition.” Terms such as “crisis of participation” or Sartori's “extreme pluralism,” from the book edited by Joseph La Palombara and Myron Weiner,2 are widely used in the description of party systems. Even the study of one-p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Brady 2001. 21 Some notable articles include Goodin 1975, Lipset 1959, Merkl 1969, Taylor and Rae 1969, Zuckerman 1975, and Powell 1976 Although the notions of "political cleavages" and "realignment" were not entirely a result of the behavioral revolution, they received a great impetus from it. 10 Hamilton, Madison, and Jay 1982, 51.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 Brady 2001. 21 Some notable articles include Goodin 1975, Lipset 1959, Merkl 1969, Taylor and Rae 1969, Zuckerman 1975, and Powell 1976 Although the notions of "political cleavages" and "realignment" were not entirely a result of the behavioral revolution, they received a great impetus from it. 10 Hamilton, Madison, and Jay 1982, 51.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Spencer 1914, 564. 21 Some notable articles include Goodin 1975, Lipset 1959, Merkl 1969, Taylor and Rae 1969, Zuckerman 1975, and Powell 1976 Although the notions of "political cleavages" and "realignment" were not entirely a result of the behavioral revolution, they received a great impetus from it. Scaling received impetus from behavioralism and then from political methodology, especially Rice 1928, Beyle 1931, Turner 1951, Schubert 1962, MacRae 1965, Poole and Rosenthal 1985, and Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers 2004 course, the spatial model developed from the work of Black 1948and 1958, Downs 1957, Davis, Hinich, and Ordeshook 1970, McKelvey 1975, and many others, especially those affiliated with the University of Rochester under the leadership of William Riker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their pivotal work on conflicts and their translation from and into party systems, Lipset and Rokkan [19] show that divergent attitudes between culturally dominant and subjected populations, workers in primary and secondary economic activities, and supporters of established and subversive values generate more or less salient divides between voters. The overlap of cleavages and the spatial cluster of voters produces local and regional contrasts in partisan supports, macroscopic patterns in vote outcomes and a geographic institutionalization of conflicts [20].…”
Section: From Political Divides To Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los dos primeros responden a lo que comúnmente se ha pensado como una dimensión territorial-cultural, mientras que los dos últimos a la dimensión funcionaleconómica (Merkl, 1969). A partir de esas dicotomías, según los autores, fueron generándose los sistemas de partidos, emergiendo organizaciones políticas que defendían cada uno de estos intereses, produciendo lo que denominaron "Verzuiling" o "pilarización".…”
Section: Revista De La Facultad De Ciencias Sociales Universidad Naciunclassified