2012
DOI: 10.1086/665602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Connections and Social Networks in Targeted Transfer Programs: Evidence from Rural Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-Iddir‖ is a social network that pervades both rural and urban communities in Ethiopia. While its primary function is providing group-based informal insurance, researchers find that it also plays a critical role in overcoming market imperfections by expediting the flow of information within and beyond the village, reducing monitoring and enforcement costs (Berhane et al, 2009;Abay et al, 2014) and developing trust among agents (Caeyers and Dercon, 2012). In some casea, via institutional arrangements nested within it, it corrects coordination failures in the management of communal natural resources (Stellmacher and Mollinga, 2009).…”
Section: Econometric Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Iddir‖ is a social network that pervades both rural and urban communities in Ethiopia. While its primary function is providing group-based informal insurance, researchers find that it also plays a critical role in overcoming market imperfections by expediting the flow of information within and beyond the village, reducing monitoring and enforcement costs (Berhane et al, 2009;Abay et al, 2014) and developing trust among agents (Caeyers and Dercon, 2012). In some casea, via institutional arrangements nested within it, it corrects coordination failures in the management of communal natural resources (Stellmacher and Mollinga, 2009).…”
Section: Econometric Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies [12][13][14][15][16] acknowledge the promotive and protective functions of informal mutual support arrangements: before or ex ante, during, and after crisis or ex post situations or shocks. Communities forming such arrangements tend to exhibit better recovery from shocks [16] and need public emergency assistance less urgently than those communities without such arrangements [17]. Nonetheless, studies on resilience, disaster management policy, and practices have yet to fully embrace indigenous mutual support arrangements as a vital component in addressing vulnerability [18][19][20][21][22] against livelihood shocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the paper is related to some recent works on political elite capture in public welfare programmes that have studied household-level survey datasets: Besley et al (2012), Caeyers and Dercon (2012), Alatas et al (2013), and Lanjouw and Ravallion (1999). Although Besley et al (2012) have not explicitly mentioned the term 'political connections' in their study of 120 south Indian villages, they find that being a village-level elected political executive (rather than being connected to a political executive like we have studied in this paper) increases the probability of obtaining a ration card meant for the poor, while exploiting the within-village variation in access to political power and controlling for wealth, education, and asset-based eligibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chief councillor's (Gram Pradhan) village also obtains more public goods relative to other villages. Using a dataset of 15 rural areas covered in the Ethiopian Rural Household Survey, Caeyers and Dercon (2012), on the other hand, found that local political connections positively affected the delivery of a public food transfers programme in Ethiopia, although only clearly in the period right after the drought. They find that households with local political connections get significantly higher cash or food receipts per working day, and in total in the public food-for-work programme, than the households without such connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%