2001
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0343.00092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Determinants of Intergovernmental Grants: Evidence From Argentina

Abstract: This paper explores the determinants of federal grants allocation across provincial states in Argentina. Our analysis suggests that the redistributive pattern implicit in the federal system of intergovernmental grants cannot be explained on normative grounds exclusively. In order to understand the rationale behind federal grants distribution, a positive approach could render better results. Speci®cally, we claim that the distribution of federal grants could be associated with political variables such as the po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
13

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
78
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Advances in data availability now permit extension of this line of research to other countries. Results identify patterns of partisan-political distributive politics in nations as diverse as Albania (Case 2001), Argentina (Calvo and Murillo 2004;Porto and Sanguinetti 2001), Australia (Denemark 2000;Worthington and Dollery 1998), Brazil (Ames 2001), Canada (Kneebone and McKenzie 2001), Colombia (Crisp and Ingall 2002) England (Ward and John 1999;John and Ward 2001), France (Cadot, Röller, and Stephan 2006), Germany (Stratmann and Baur 2002), India (Rao and Singh 2005), Japan (Horiuchi and Saito 2003), Mexico (Magaloni 2006, ch. 4), Peru (Schady 2000), Russia (Treisman 1996), South Korea (Kwon 2005), and Sweden (Dahlberg and Johansson 2002), as well as across Africa (Kasara 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in data availability now permit extension of this line of research to other countries. Results identify patterns of partisan-political distributive politics in nations as diverse as Albania (Case 2001), Argentina (Calvo and Murillo 2004;Porto and Sanguinetti 2001), Australia (Denemark 2000;Worthington and Dollery 1998), Brazil (Ames 2001), Canada (Kneebone and McKenzie 2001), Colombia (Crisp and Ingall 2002) England (Ward and John 1999;John and Ward 2001), France (Cadot, Röller, and Stephan 2006), Germany (Stratmann and Baur 2002), India (Rao and Singh 2005), Japan (Horiuchi and Saito 2003), Mexico (Magaloni 2006, ch. 4), Peru (Schady 2000), Russia (Treisman 1996), South Korea (Kwon 2005), and Sweden (Dahlberg and Johansson 2002), as well as across Africa (Kasara 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La variable construida a partir de esta información indica para cada hijo adulto la proporción de años durante su adolescencia o juventud en los que el gobernador de su provincia fue del mismo partido que el presidente al mando. La inclusión de esta variable como control en el modelo empírico se fundamenta principalmente en la evidencia empírica disponible que revela que más allá de las necesidades y capacidades fiscales locales, otros factores relacionados con las influencias políticas juegan un rol importante en la determinación de las asignaciones horizontales de las transferencias intergubernamentales (Boex y Martinez-Vazquez, 2005;Porto y Sanguinetti, 2001, Atlas et al, 1995.…”
Section: Anexo B Breve Descripcion De Los Datos Sobre Gasto Publico Yunclassified
“…States that are organised under the Federal system of government are even more complex because they do not only cover different spatial units but different autonomous governmental units. This obviously brings forth a new form of dimension to the issue of governmental transfers (Porto and Sanguinetti, 2001). Generally, governments around the world assume a normative posture in the distribution of resources to different jurisdictions across the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, governments around the world assume a normative posture in the distribution of resources to different jurisdictions across the country. By assuming the normative stands, governments would like to have us believe that the pool of government resources is proportionally distributed among all sub-government units based on factors such as population density/size, expenditure needs of regions or even based on the levels of poverty in the various regions (Rothchild, 1984;Porto and Sanguinetti, 2001;Pearson, 2002;Boex and Martinez-Vasquez, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation