2006
DOI: 10.1191/0309132506ph613pr
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political ecology: where is the policy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
77
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined materialist and discursive political ecology research remains urgent in less developed countries of the Global South, especially in the face of climate change where many winners and losers will emerge from uneven adaptation policies. What Forsyth (2011) thus calls a "situated environmental science" also echoes calls for more ecological analysis (Walker 2005) as well as critical engagement with policy-makers in political ecology (Walker 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined materialist and discursive political ecology research remains urgent in less developed countries of the Global South, especially in the face of climate change where many winners and losers will emerge from uneven adaptation policies. What Forsyth (2011) thus calls a "situated environmental science" also echoes calls for more ecological analysis (Walker 2005) as well as critical engagement with policy-makers in political ecology (Walker 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing resource distribution using IS-plots may be fruitful in such disciplines as political ecology (Martínez-Alier, 2002, Walker, 2006, the new field of study of the environmental component of world systems theory/analysis (Jorgenson et al, 2009) and others (for a survey see Fisher et al, 2013). In a dynamic context, concepts like exploitation, colonization, migration or the shaping of general inequality can be demonstrated in a new way by using the Intenscope.…”
Section: Political Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus on material and discursive dimensions of power means that 'struggles', and all the subjectivity they produce [14], are central to my argument. Critics rightly note that this does not translate easily into neat policy recommendations and much-craved templates of 'best practices' and 'evidencebased optimal allocations' [15]. However, I submit that rather than such an 'unrigorous' analysis miscasting water security, risk and energy development in Africa, it is subjectivity itself that matters tremendously to knowledge creation, problem diagnosis and policy implementation [16] and that needs to be studied to help to explain the ostensibly irrational decisions and oppositions that technocrats so often deplore.…”
Section: Introduction: Three Ways Of Thinking About Water Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%