2000
DOI: 10.1177/096977640000700306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political, Economic and Social Arguments in Favour of and against Enlargement of the European Union: A Review of Influential Pressure Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been growing recognition of the ambiguity of the availability of CAP/CARPE funds for farmers in candidate countries such as Hungary. After enlargement, the more liberalized trade in agricultural products will result in an increasingly uneven distribution of income and profits at the expense of new producers with weak financial bases and little experience of international trade (Inotai, 2000). This reinforces the argument for a shift to alternative forms of farming for small producers, allied to greater cooperation especially among medium-scale farmers.…”
Section: Attitudes Value Systems and Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…There has been growing recognition of the ambiguity of the availability of CAP/CARPE funds for farmers in candidate countries such as Hungary. After enlargement, the more liberalized trade in agricultural products will result in an increasingly uneven distribution of income and profits at the expense of new producers with weak financial bases and little experience of international trade (Inotai, 2000). This reinforces the argument for a shift to alternative forms of farming for small producers, allied to greater cooperation especially among medium-scale farmers.…”
Section: Attitudes Value Systems and Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Freedom to move around and work in the EU was regularly cited as an important freedom in CEE assessments of the overall benefits of EU membership (e.g. Szemlér 1998, Inotai 1999, Mayhew 2000. The political dynamics were thus about a positive benefit being denied to the candidates by the Union, rather than a negative demand being imposed on them.…”
Section: The Candidates' Responses the Political Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in various academic writings Turkey's candidacy is seen as a mistake or at least as an early attempt and sometimes completely neglected (e.g. Inotai, 2000;Smith, 2000;Wessels, 2001;Zielonka, 2001). 9 This official document is prepared by the Turkish Republic and submitted to the EU.…”
Section: Conclusion: the Beginning?mentioning
confidence: 99%