Political Elites and the Question of Ethnicity and Democracy in Iran: A Critical View

Abstract

This article presents a critical view of the contemporary studies in the realm of ethnicity and nationality in Iran. Discussing the conceptual, methodological and theoretical pitfalls of such studies, the author claims that the lack of an approach based on the historical sociology and the failure to consider the historical specificities of the Iranian case have distorted the issue of ethnicity and national identity in Iran. Considering the relation between ethnicity and democracy, the author argues that the way ethnicity and ethnic factors have been instrumentally politicised by the regional and international actors, as well as the domestic political elites, has created serious obstacles for the rise and consolidation of democracy in Iran. Such an instrumental approach toward the question of ethnicity in itself stems from the fact that the reality of the ethnic and national issues in the Iranian society has been misunderstood.

Ethnic, National and Identity Demands in Iran on the Axis of Justice and Development: A Grounded Theory Method Study among Five Major Ethnic Groups

“…Theoreticians such as Hans Kuhn and, more regularly, Anthony Smith have analyzed the role of the elite in nationalist movements, considering the extension of the government's control domain and greater tendency toward centralization as a source of appropriate conditions for ideological mobility provided by "scientific intellectuals." John Viruili also regards nationalism as a particular, successful form of modern policy adopted by the elite to divest the dominant class of the power of government (Ahmadi, 2018).…”

On Democracy in Iran in the Islamic Republic Era: A Knowledge-based Social Outline

“…As Ahmadi argues, ethnicity and ethnic groups are “ambiguous and controversial,” and there is no agreement on their exact definitions (Ahmadi, 1997, p. 62). However, it cannot be ignored that Iran has always been a multilingual country with diverse ethnic groups.…”

Understanding the Reasons for Transition from Iranian Constitutional State to Authoritarian State: an Analysis in the Framework of Laclau and Mouffe’s Discourse Theory

“…The clerics, the intellectuals, the political, the cultural and economic elites were in constant conflicts with political and government officials after the years of Iran-Russia wars. The constitutional discourse reacted to the Russian-English cultural, political and social movements in Iran, then tried to stabilize otherness with the discourse of the courts and foreign forces (Ahmadi, 2011).…”