Political instability patterns are obscured by conflict dataset scope conditions, sources, and coding choices

Abstract

Conflict event datasets are used widely in academic, policymaking, and public spheres. Accounting for political violence across the world requires detailing conflict types, agents, characteristics, and source information. The public and policymaking communities may underestimate the impact of data collection decisions across global, real-time conflict event datasets. Here, we consider four widely used public datasets with global coverage and demonstrate how they differ by definitions of conflict, and which aspects of the information-sourcing processes they prioritize. First, we identify considerable disparities between automated conflict coding projects and researcher-led projects, largely resulting from few inclusion barriers and no data oversight. Second, we compare researcher-led datasets in greater detail. At the crux of their differences is whether a dataset prioritizes and mandates internal reliability by imposing initial conflict definitions on present events, or whether a dataset’s agenda is to capture an externally valid and comprehensive assessment of present violence patterns. Prioritizing reliability privileges specific forms of violence, despite the possibility that other forms actually occur; and leads to reliance on international and English-language information sources. Privileging validity requires a wide definition of political violence forms, and requires diverse, multi-lingual, and local sources. These conceptual, coding, and sourcing variations have significant implications for the use of these data in academic analysis and for practitioner responses to crisis and instability. These foundational differences mean that answers to “which country is most violent?”; “where are civilians most at risk?”; and “is the frequency of conflict increasing or decreasing?” vary according to datasets all purporting to capture the same phenomena of political violence.

Confronting the Philippines' war on drugs: A literature review

“…They recorded 7029 drug-related killings from 10 May 2016 to 31 December 2018. This number is consistent with the Armed Conflict and Local Events Dataset (ACLED, a non-profit organization in the United States) record of fatalities in violent events targeting civilians in the Philippines for the same time period (Raleigh et al, 2023) other concerned parties' (Limpin & Siringan, 2019). Both academic initiatives partake the character of illustrative efforts at creating an auditable and reproducible record of killings, but which are limited by the fact that they largely rely on news media or journalistic reports in the absence of official data.…”

Introducing a global dataset on conflict forecasts and news topics

“…The resulting depth of trees varies between 3 and 5 nodes and the number of trees is either 300 or 400. In terms of grid-cell level predictors, we include the discounted past deaths, time since the last battle death, current battle deaths, discounted and current neighboring battle deaths, local news topics, neighboring news topics, distance to capital, population, discounted and current number of riots and protests obtained from ACLED, the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (Raleigh et al, 2010, 2023), time since the last riot and protest, consecutive months of battle deaths. …”

“…discounted and current number of riots and protests obtained from ACLED, the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (Raleigh et al, 2010, 2023),…”

The purpose of the company beyond its position in the market: The new agent of social development

“…However, the problems have slowed down the achievement of the SDGs, taking them to compliance dates much further than initially planned (Li et al, 2023). This represents an alert about the differences between global needs and the actions that have been (or will be) taken by social actors (Raleigh et al, 2023; United Nations, 2022). Therefore, the difficulties generated by the global crises and the lack of dedication of the governments in the care of their own countries makes it necessary to invoke the private sector.…”