Democratic Brazil Revisited
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt6wr9x1.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Institutions and Governability from FHC to Lula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(Figueiredo and Limongi, 2000: 167) This camp argues that voluntary consultations on the monthly agenda between chamber presidents and a committee of party leaders (the Colegio) effectively creates a parliamentary process with agenda power centralized in the hands of party leaders (Figueiredo and Limongi, 2000). Party control over committee appointments facilitates control over amendments, and powers to cast symbolic votes on behalf of their delegations and to request roll calls facilitate control over voting (Figueiredo and Limongi, 2000;Lyne, 2008;Santos and Vilarouca, 2008). The result is high levels of legislative party unity as evidenced by the high values of party Rice across party delegations (Figueiredo and Limongi, 2000;Lyne, 2008;Santos and Vilarouca, 2008).…”
Section: Legislative Party Strength In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Figueiredo and Limongi, 2000: 167) This camp argues that voluntary consultations on the monthly agenda between chamber presidents and a committee of party leaders (the Colegio) effectively creates a parliamentary process with agenda power centralized in the hands of party leaders (Figueiredo and Limongi, 2000). Party control over committee appointments facilitates control over amendments, and powers to cast symbolic votes on behalf of their delegations and to request roll calls facilitate control over voting (Figueiredo and Limongi, 2000;Lyne, 2008;Santos and Vilarouca, 2008). The result is high levels of legislative party unity as evidenced by the high values of party Rice across party delegations (Figueiredo and Limongi, 2000;Lyne, 2008;Santos and Vilarouca, 2008).…”
Section: Legislative Party Strength In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 As well as the patrimonial and authoritarian practices of politicians inherited from the military regime, if not earlier (Marks, 1993). 17 The institutional disincentives are detailed by Power and Ames (2010); Power (2010), Amorim Neto (2002); Armijo, Faucher and Dembinska, (2006); Cintra (2007); and Santos and Vilarouca (2008). The effective number of parties in the Congress was 8.2 in 1994 and 7.1 in 1998, and volatility from 1994 to 1998 was 25 percent (Kinzo, 2004: 32.…”
Section: Period 2: the Neoliberal Cleavagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not an exhaustive list of the issues involved in reforma política, which the Brazilian political class has been debating for two decades. Reformers have argued for various rule changes with a view to improving accountability, strengthening party organizations, and improving transparency (for arguments that many of the proposed rule changes are unnecessary, see Cheibub 2009;Santos and Vilarouca 2008). Similarly to the pattern observed with regard to corruption control, politicians have been notoriously reluctant to regulate themselves.…”
Section: Political Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%