2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0143814x17000174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political land corruption: evidence from Malta – the European Union’s smallest member state

Abstract: Political corruption in the land sector is pervasive, but difficult to document and effectively prosecute. This article provides new evidence on political land corruption in Malta, the European Union’s smallest member state and one of the world’s most densely populated countries. It shows how the country’s highly restrictive zoning laws, along with a de jure independent regulator, have created opportunities for extensive and endemic corruption in the granting of land development permits in zones that are outsi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another local study focused directly on web-scraped development-planning applications, with a particular focus on the ratio of the number of granted ODZ permits to the total number of permits granted within the development zone. The ratio of ODZ permits granted close to election periods, and the instances of the Planning Authority Board permitting developments, notwithstanding the planning officers' recommendation to refuse the issuance of permits, supports the hypothesis that land development and the institutions regulating it are used as a political mechanism by incumbent governments to garner votes during elections [71].…”
Section: Data Collationmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another local study focused directly on web-scraped development-planning applications, with a particular focus on the ratio of the number of granted ODZ permits to the total number of permits granted within the development zone. The ratio of ODZ permits granted close to election periods, and the instances of the Planning Authority Board permitting developments, notwithstanding the planning officers' recommendation to refuse the issuance of permits, supports the hypothesis that land development and the institutions regulating it are used as a political mechanism by incumbent governments to garner votes during elections [71].…”
Section: Data Collationmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…These results demonstrate a need for further reflection on and analysis of the granting of ODZ applications and a much deeper understanding and discussion on the impact of the ODZ designation in Malta's planning system. It is clear that although the original objective of the ODZ was to safeguard the rural areas of Malta, there is considerable pressure to extend development within this area both because of the cheaper land prices and because of the attractiveness of this area away from the development zone [71]. The results show that a consistently higher percentage of granted applications are located within the development zone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The CPI was used in this research as a proxy to represent political corruption in the land sector for private gain. Opportunities for this kind of corruption result from privatization of state-own land, zoning limits and building permits, expropriation of private land for government-related projects, negotiation of large-scale land acquisitions by investors, and others [90]. Land is one of the key factors of production alongside with labour and capital; failure to manage land properly may lead to uprisings and questioning of the legitimacy of governments given that land provides revenue through land taxation or provides the basis for claims to other revenue sources [91].…”
Section: Corruption In Public Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is quite challenging to make nationally implemented policies work in such a way that they lead to intended outcomes. Unintended consequences of global models implemented in national contexts are primarily documented for developing states (Homedes & Ugalde 2005;Hammergren, 1998;Lahiff, 2007;Lahiff, Borras & Kay 2007;Borras, Carranza & Franco, 2007;Persson, Rothtein & Teorell, 2012;Gauster & Isakson, 2007;Pomfret, 2000;Rupidara & McGraw, 2010;Sehring, 2009) and much less for developed states (Caruana-Galizia & Caruana-Galizia, 2018;Schelkle, 2019;Butler, 2003). This is not surprising since most global models originate from a Western perspective.…”
Section: Means-ends Decoupling At the State Level And Implementation mentioning
confidence: 99%