2020
DOI: 10.1002/tie.22120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political risk in private participation projects: The effects of political discretionality and corruption

Abstract: This article investigates the impact of political risk on the performance of private participation infrastructure projects in emerging markets. Previous studies have shown that firms in regulated sectors are prone to employ political capabilities in their investments overseas. Our analysis of 32,257 projects in 114 emerging countries from 1997 to 2013 shows that higher political discretionality in the host country is negatively associated with project completion. In contrast, a higher level of corruption in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(121 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The independent variable is the trading partner's level of corruption. We used two proxies for corruption at the country level: (i) the World Governance Indicators' (WGI) Corruption Index, and (ii) Transparency International's (TI) Corruption Perception Index (Habib & Zurawicki, 2002; Hakimi & Hamdi, 2017; Hayakawa, Kimura, & Lee, 2013; Jimenez & Bayraktar, 2020; Okada & Samreth, 2012; Osabutey & Okoro, 2015; Schudel, 2008; Thakur & Kannadhasan, 2019). We rescaled both indicators to simplify the interpretation of the coefficients (see Table 2 for details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The independent variable is the trading partner's level of corruption. We used two proxies for corruption at the country level: (i) the World Governance Indicators' (WGI) Corruption Index, and (ii) Transparency International's (TI) Corruption Perception Index (Habib & Zurawicki, 2002; Hakimi & Hamdi, 2017; Hayakawa, Kimura, & Lee, 2013; Jimenez & Bayraktar, 2020; Okada & Samreth, 2012; Osabutey & Okoro, 2015; Schudel, 2008; Thakur & Kannadhasan, 2019). We rescaled both indicators to simplify the interpretation of the coefficients (see Table 2 for details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of the PPI projects, which are usually led by foreign investors, the consequences of the corruption are more drastic due to their lack of familiarity to local context, relational and transactional costs (Henisz and Delios, 2001). Moreover, political stability brought consistency to county policies (Jimenez and Bayraktar, 2020), boost foreign Managing private participation direct investment and business activities, (Li and Liu, 2005), which has positive impact on the project success. On the other hand, the uncertainty of political events, such as regime changes, coups, revolution and political violence, leads to instability in the market and changes in policies, which negatively impacts projects (Chang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, FDI research should focus more on cultural differences (which sometimes, indeed, has already been included) (Dikova et al , 2019; Sampath and Rahman, 2019) rather than on the corruption measurement. The latter might be effectively replaced with more objective measures, for instance the World Governance Indicator (Jimenez and Bayraktar, 2020; Ozili, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adomako et al (2020) analyzed the effects of perceived corruption in small and medium-sized enterprises’ home countries and the level of their business process digitization. Jimenez and Bayraktar (2020) examined the effects of corruption and political discretionality on the probability of completion of a private project. Sadeghi et al (2019) considered the impact of corruption and institutions on international entrepreneurship.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%