2012
DOI: 10.5192/215409930302139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Politics and Islamization in African Public Spheres

Abstract: Public Islam and Muslim publics provide a useful framework for understanding how technology and new social and political contexts have impacted discourses of religion in the public sphere. This article proposes that scholarly attention on Muslim publics has been guided by the different impacts of Wilfred Cantwell Smith and Jürgen Habermas. Smith’s theory of reification has focused attention on the production of Islam(s), while Habermas’s work has focused attention on the production of new values for democratic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new media and democratic politics enable ordinary Muslims -not only religious authorities and secular intellectuals -to articulate their views of Islam publicly and be part of the Muslim public (Eickelman and Anderson 2003;Salvatore and Eickelman 2004;Tayob 2007). Tayob (2012) points out the self-limitations in Eickelman, Salvatore and Anderson's confi rmative notion of a Muslim public which fails to include voices of the counter-public and critical expressions of public Islam. For this paper, the notion of a Muslim public includes confi rmative and critical expressions of Islam, but also includes all those who happen to observe it, Muslims and non-Muslims, including the readers of this paper.…”
Section: Somali Community Formationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The new media and democratic politics enable ordinary Muslims -not only religious authorities and secular intellectuals -to articulate their views of Islam publicly and be part of the Muslim public (Eickelman and Anderson 2003;Salvatore and Eickelman 2004;Tayob 2007). Tayob (2012) points out the self-limitations in Eickelman, Salvatore and Anderson's confi rmative notion of a Muslim public which fails to include voices of the counter-public and critical expressions of public Islam. For this paper, the notion of a Muslim public includes confi rmative and critical expressions of Islam, but also includes all those who happen to observe it, Muslims and non-Muslims, including the readers of this paper.…”
Section: Somali Community Formationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Third, recent literatures on public Islam (e.g. Eickelman and Anderson, 2003;Eickelman and Salvatore, 2006;Tayob, 2012) have emphasized the extent to which new self-styled religious authorities -''secular intellectuals, Sufi orders, mothers, students, workers, engineers, and many others'' (Eickelman and Salvatore, 2006: xii) -have challenged the interpretive monopolies claimed, in theory if not always in practice, by traditionally educated Islamic religious scholars (the ulama). The ulama, in South Africa as elsewhere, have attempted to adapt to this terrain (Zaman, 2002), continuing a long tradition of public critique premised on the idea that a healthy polity depends on the moral integrity of individuals (Asad, 1993: 200-236).…”
Section: Religious Radio Muslim Publics and Ulama Authoritymentioning
confidence: 99%