2016
DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2016.1145871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Politics of Comparative Quantification: The Case of Governance Metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the policy debate, the enhancement of the firms' competitiveness potential occupies the center of attention increasingly. In this context, benchmarking on government policies about entrepreneurship becomes essential (Erkkilä, Peters, & Piironen, 2016;Kergroach, Meissner, & Vonortas, 2018) Concerning Europe, since the beginning of the current global restructuring and crisis (Andrikopoulos & Nastopoulos, 2015;Boyer, 2015;Laudicina & Peterson, 2016) and the consequent urgency for structural reforms, the EU started to provide positive examples and best practices through its reports to the member-states. In this context, the need for structural reforms becomes pressing in the current phase of restructuring of globalization since it seems that the rules of the entire "gameplay" are changing, at all levels of actors (individuals, firms, and whole industries), space (local, national, international, and global), and socio-economic symbiosis (ideological, cultural, ethical, and political).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the policy debate, the enhancement of the firms' competitiveness potential occupies the center of attention increasingly. In this context, benchmarking on government policies about entrepreneurship becomes essential (Erkkilä, Peters, & Piironen, 2016;Kergroach, Meissner, & Vonortas, 2018) Concerning Europe, since the beginning of the current global restructuring and crisis (Andrikopoulos & Nastopoulos, 2015;Boyer, 2015;Laudicina & Peterson, 2016) and the consequent urgency for structural reforms, the EU started to provide positive examples and best practices through its reports to the member-states. In this context, the need for structural reforms becomes pressing in the current phase of restructuring of globalization since it seems that the rules of the entire "gameplay" are changing, at all levels of actors (individuals, firms, and whole industries), space (local, national, international, and global), and socio-economic symbiosis (ideological, cultural, ethical, and political).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firms are now central agents of action that both shape and are shaped respectively by the multi-level socio-economic environment: local, national, regional, and global (Vlados et al, 2018). Fostering firm innovation acquires increasing significance among policymakers, and one way of recognising which policies that aim to improve the business environment are successful is international benchmarking (Erkkilä et al, 2016;Kergroach et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the policy debate, the enhancement of the firms' competitiveness potential occupies the center of attention increasingly. In this context, international benchmarking on government policies about entrepreneurship becomes essential (Erkkilä et al, 2016;Kergroach et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%