Politik für eine nachhaltigere Ernährung: Eine integrierte Ernährungspolitik entwickeln und faire Ernährungsbedingungen gestalten.

Spiller, Achim; Renner, Britta; Voget-Kleschin, Lieske; Arens-Azevedo, Ulrike; Balmann, Alfons; Biesalski, Hans Konrad; Birner, Regina; Bokelmann, Wolfgang; Christen, Olaf; Gauly, Matthias; Grethe, Harald; Latacz‐Lohmann, Uwe; Martínez, José; Nieberg, Hiltrud; Pischetsrieder, Monika; Qaim, Matin; Schmid, Julia Christiane; Taube, F.; Weingarten, Peter

doi:10.12767/buel.vi230.308

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, demand-side changes are needed to contribute to lower food-related GHG emissions and to reduce diet-related diseases, such as diabetes and coronary heart disease (Bajželj et al, 2013;Clark et al, 2020;Creutzig et al, 2016). In particular, the importance of dietary shifts towards reduced shares of animal-based foods is increasingly emphasised in social and political debates (Bonnet et al, 2020;Bryngelsson et al, 2016;Spiller et al, 2020;Willett et al, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

From fork to farm: Impacts of more sustainable diets in the EU‐27 on the agricultural sector

Rieger

Freund

Offermann

et al. 2023

J Agricultural Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The implications of dietary changes for the environment and for human health are well documented, but the impacts on the agricultural sector are less well researched. We fill this gap by specifying scenarios in which European consumers' diets approximate the EAT‐Lancet dietary recommendations to varying degrees and estimate the effects on agricultural production, incomes and emissions using an agro‐economic modelling framework. The combination of different models allows for a detailed assessment of consequences for the agricultural sector from the global through European NUTS2 level to the farm level at different time scales. Shifting European consumption towards the EAT‐Lancet recommendations leads to decreasing production of animal‐based products, while production of fruits and vegetables increases sharply. The results indicate that the agricultural sector could benefit from a dietary shift, though the results are mixed at country, regional and farm levels. In particular, countries and regions that are highly specialised in animal farming are likely to lose income—at least in the short run—while regions with higher shares of vegetable and fruit farms can expect income gains. In Germany, pig and poultry farms may experience losses of up to 34% of their income, whereas farms with a high share of vegetables could gain more than 30% in income. Our results have implications for the policies to assist these extensive structural adjustments in response to widespread dietary changes.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

From fork to farm: Impacts of more sustainable diets in the EU‐27 on the agricultural sector

Rieger

Freund

Offermann

et al. 2023

J Agricultural Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additionally to these 34 measures, we included three measures which were not mentioned in the interviews but recently discussed in the literature: Levy on nitrogen surpluses, 57 Mandatory animal welfare label and Label-based tax on animal welfare. 11 We specified the resulting total of 37 measures in their wording, made them concrete by means of a brief description, and classified them in an explorative approach along three categories – the thematic area addressed by the measure; the area of the food system to which the measure can be assigned; and the type of measure, e.g., whether the measure is a voluntary measure or a binding regulation. The resulting matrix of meat reduction measures including their specification by brief descriptions is shown in full in the Table S1 .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various studies point to simultaneous health and environmental benefits of reduced meat consumption 7 , 8 , 9 and argue for a reduction of meat consumption as an important precondition for thoroughgoing animal welfare improvements. 10 , 11 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%