2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-001-0789-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollen competition and seed-siring success in Picea abies

Abstract: The aim of the present work was to study pollen-tube competition in Picea abies. Controlled crossings were performed with pollen mixtures including pairs of pollen lots with fast and slowly elongating pollen-tubes. Paternity analysis using isozyme markers was performed on the progenies in order to study whether the in vitro pollen-germination vigour corresponds to the proportion of seeds sired by the pollen donor. Paternal success was found to be unequal, 15 out of 23 crossings producing progeny that differed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consistently found non-random patterns of siring among donors in mixed pollinations. Differential success of pollen donors in mixed-donor pollinations has been demonstrated in a variety of species and contexts (Snow and Spira 1991;Bertin 1986;Aronen et al 2002;Husband et al 2002). However, there was no positive correlation between the siring success of donors in mixture and in single-donor pollinations on any of the recipient genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We consistently found non-random patterns of siring among donors in mixed pollinations. Differential success of pollen donors in mixed-donor pollinations has been demonstrated in a variety of species and contexts (Snow and Spira 1991;Bertin 1986;Aronen et al 2002;Husband et al 2002). However, there was no positive correlation between the siring success of donors in mixture and in single-donor pollinations on any of the recipient genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this study, the substantial male reproductive success of clone 53 was mainly due to its high contribution to seed production in clone 6 (accounting for about 64 % of its total fertilizations). The floral synchrony period between these clones is not very long, so other factors such as pollen competition may also influence male reproductive success (STOEHR et al, 1999;NIKKANEN et al, 2000;ARONEN et al, 2002). Further study is required to assess this possibility.…”
Section: Relationships Between Male Reproductive Success and Biologicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-pollination, pre-fertilization mating success reflects factors such as pollen germination rate (Niesesbaum and Schueller 1997;Nikkanen et al 2000;Aronen et al 2002) or PTGR (Snow and Spira 1991;Johnston 1993;Carney et al 1994;Emms et al 1996). These differences in rates represent potential reproduction barriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%