1988
DOI: 10.1086/284853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollen Competition, Nonrandom Fertilization, and Progeny Fitness: A Reply to Charlesworth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the relationship between pollen load size and progeny performance is well documented in the literature, the cause of this relationship has engendered much debate because variation in pollen load size simultaneously creates (1) variation in the intensity of pollen competition for access to ovules, (2) differences in maternal effects associated with differences in the number, size and location of the seeds within the ovary and (3) differences in the opportunity for non-random seed abortion (e.g. Mulcahy 1979;Charlesworth andCharlesworth 1987, 1992;Charlesworth 1988;Stephenson et al 1988b;Schlichting et al 1990;Stephenson et al 1995). This study used the techniques developed by Quesada et al (1993Quesada et al ( , 1996a for cultivars of Cucurbita to dissociate differences in the intensity of pollen competition (selection) from differences in the number, size and location of seeds within the fruit independently from differences in the opportunity for non-random seed abortion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the relationship between pollen load size and progeny performance is well documented in the literature, the cause of this relationship has engendered much debate because variation in pollen load size simultaneously creates (1) variation in the intensity of pollen competition for access to ovules, (2) differences in maternal effects associated with differences in the number, size and location of the seeds within the ovary and (3) differences in the opportunity for non-random seed abortion (e.g. Mulcahy 1979;Charlesworth andCharlesworth 1987, 1992;Charlesworth 1988;Stephenson et al 1988b;Schlichting et al 1990;Stephenson et al 1995). This study used the techniques developed by Quesada et al (1993Quesada et al ( , 1996a for cultivars of Cucurbita to dissociate differences in the intensity of pollen competition (selection) from differences in the number, size and location of seeds within the fruit independently from differences in the opportunity for non-random seed abortion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) few studies adequately control for maternal effects associated with differences in seed mass, seed number and location of the seeds within the ovary, or for postzygotic selection on developing seeds and (3) many of the studies use cultivated species as model systems (see Charlesworth 1988;Stephenson et al 1988b;Lyons et al 1989;Schlichting et al 1990;Snow 1990). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delph, Weinig, and Sullivan (1998) have hypothesized that it is the order of fertilization rather than speed of pollen tube growth that affects the vigor of the resulting progeny because the ovules fertilized early are better provisioned by the maternal plant than later fertilized ovules. Many studies show that faster growing pollen tubes fertilize ovules in different regions in the ovary than slower growing pollen tubes (Marshall and Ellstrand, 1988;Stephenson, Winsor, and Schlichting, 1988;Rocha and Stephenson, 1991), and it has been suggested that different regions in the ovary might have nutritional advantages, which, in turn, could lead to increased vigor in progeny (Stephenson, Winsor, and Schlichting, 1988). The eliminating of maternal effects by comparing the progeny resulting from small and large pollen loads in different regions of the ovary, as was done by Quesada, Winsor, and Stephenson (1993), does not rule out the possibility that high pollen loads alone may stimulate the maternal parent to allocate more resources to seeds and fruits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the relatively large stigmatic capacity of cactus flowers (up to five orders of magnitude of pollen grains can be held potentially on one stigma) guarantees the reception of enough pollen grains to fertilize most ovules. The deposition of large amounts of pollen on the stigmatic surface may promote male gametophytic competition (Stephenson and Bertin, 1983;Snow, 1986) between pollen grains from the same individual or different individuals and may possibly select for male gametophytes with higher rates of pollen tube growth (Cruden, 1977;Mulcahy, 1979;Feinsinger, 1987;Schlichting et al, 1987;Stephenson et al, 1988). If the amount of pollen deposited by bats on floral stigmas were high enough to promote sexual selection, then the service of this pollen vector could be interpreted as promoting fitter offspring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%