2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollen-mediated gene flow in the cultivation of transgenic cotton under experimental field conditions in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The breeding pedigree of this line before the ID designation of PS‐592 is obscure because a large seed increase was accomplished in an isolated, noninfested FOV4 field at the University of California Kearney Research and Extension Center, Parlier, CA, in which Pima S‐6 and Pima S‐7 germplasm were included in the same field. Outcrossing in cotton ranged from 0.5 to 10%, depending on insect pressure and bee activity for the most part (Loureiro et al., 2016; Van Deynze et al., 2011). Mass selection was applied toward selection of columnar growth and fruiting cluster habit genotypes, and open pollinated bolls were harvested from single plants in 2009.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The breeding pedigree of this line before the ID designation of PS‐592 is obscure because a large seed increase was accomplished in an isolated, noninfested FOV4 field at the University of California Kearney Research and Extension Center, Parlier, CA, in which Pima S‐6 and Pima S‐7 germplasm were included in the same field. Outcrossing in cotton ranged from 0.5 to 10%, depending on insect pressure and bee activity for the most part (Loureiro et al., 2016; Van Deynze et al., 2011). Mass selection was applied toward selection of columnar growth and fruiting cluster habit genotypes, and open pollinated bolls were harvested from single plants in 2009.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies with corn, wheat, rice and canola demonstrated that, depending on the crop, a distance of 20 to 50 m was sufficient to keep the fraction of GM plants below 0.9%. Nevertheless, presence of transgenes below 0.9% was detectable up to a maximum distance of 350 m [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] . In addition to unintended admixture with non-transgenic crops, the potential introgression of GM plants into wild relatives is discussed, particularly when the transgene might increase the plant fitness or competitiveness [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Isolation distances to manage cross-fertilisation between GM and non-GM variants of the same species differ with species, 356 from 5 to 10m for soybean, 357 about 10m for cotton, 358 , 359 20 to 50m for maize, 360 , 361 about 100m for Lolium rigidum , 362 tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea ) at 150m, 363 30 to 200m for canola, 364 , 365 and 150 to 500m for lucerne. 366 Pollen-mediated gene flow was measured in the Netherlands through growing the maize variety DKC3421YG containing the MON810 GM event at 25m (the distance indicated as required between GM crops and conventional crops) or 250m (the distance indicated as required between GM-crops and organic crops) from a near-isogenic non- GM cultivar.…”
Section: Co-existence Regulations For Gm Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%