2000
DOI: 10.2307/2656892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollen quality limits seed set in Burchardia umbellata (Colchicaceae)

Abstract: In self-incompatible plants, interference by self pollen or genetically related pollen can potentially exacerbate pollen limitation, although this has rarely been demonstrated. We examined the breeding system, pollen limitation, and pollen interference using self- and cross- pollinations and pollen supplementations in Burchardia umbellata, an insect-pollinated lilioid monocot. Ovule fertilization and seed set were less following selfing than crossing (22 vs. 78% and 4 vs. 73%, respectively), indicating partial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
67
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases where pollinator visitation is not affected by population size or density, plants in small populations may still suffer reduced seed set if the effectiveness of pollination, due to pollen quality, declines (Kunin 1993;Lamont et al 1993;Wolf and Harrison 2001). This may occur through the deposition of foreign rather than conspecific pollen, or through the transfer of incompatible pollen, if a selfincompatibility mechanism is present (Feinsinger et al 1991;Kunin 1993;Aizen and Feinsinger 1994;Groom 1998;Ramsey and Vaughton 2000). Essentially, the efficiency of pollination, in terms of both the quantity and quality of pollen received, declines as patches become too small or the distance between plants becomes too great (Courchamp et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where pollinator visitation is not affected by population size or density, plants in small populations may still suffer reduced seed set if the effectiveness of pollination, due to pollen quality, declines (Kunin 1993;Lamont et al 1993;Wolf and Harrison 2001). This may occur through the deposition of foreign rather than conspecific pollen, or through the transfer of incompatible pollen, if a selfincompatibility mechanism is present (Feinsinger et al 1991;Kunin 1993;Aizen and Feinsinger 1994;Groom 1998;Ramsey and Vaughton 2000). Essentially, the efficiency of pollination, in terms of both the quantity and quality of pollen received, declines as patches become too small or the distance between plants becomes too great (Courchamp et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low pollen viability reduces the germination rate and lowers the seed setting rate 8,9 . Apart from pollen viability, stigma receptivity, and self-incompatibility are also factors that could affect the seed-setting rate 10,11 . Self-incompatibility is caused by the interaction between pollen and stigma containing a similar genetic pattern; this is a mechanism that prevents inbreeding in plants 10,11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from pollen viability, stigma receptivity, and self-incompatibility are also factors that could affect the seed-setting rate 10,11 . Self-incompatibility is caused by the interaction between pollen and stigma containing a similar genetic pattern; this is a mechanism that prevents inbreeding in plants 10,11 . The mechanism often coexists with protogyny, where the stigma develops faster than the anther, or with protandry, where the anther develops faster than the stigma [12][13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pollinator behavior and genetic incompatibility due to relatedness among individuals within patches may reduce pollen germination and fecundity among genetically similar patch populations as an Allee effect. The observed Allee effect in pollen germination success due to the reduction of compatible pollen persists despite substantial patch population size (Ramsey and Vaughton, 2000;Leducq et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%