1996
DOI: 10.2307/2410691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollen-Tube Competition, Siring Success, and Consistent Asymmetric Hybridization in Louisiana Irises

Abstract: Postpollination mechanisms can play an important role in limiting natural hybridization in plants. Reciprocal hand pollination experiments were performed to study these mechanisms in two species of Louisiana iris: Iris brevicaulis and I. fulva. Relative pollen-tube growth rates changed significantly through time, with I. fulva tubes increasingly outperforming I. brevicaulis tubes in both conspecific and heterospecific styles. However, this pattern of change in relative performance was a poor predictor of sirin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, pre-pollination mechanisms, including di¡erences in £owering time and £oral morphology that result in di¡erential pollinator speci¢-city, have often been thought to be among the most important barriers to gene exchange between plants (Levin 1978;Grant 1981;Schemske & Bradshaw 1999) and these were not included in this study. In addition, the pollinations from which these data came were conducted without pollen competition, although in natural conditions pollen competition may be important in determining the probability of hybrid formation (Emms et al 1996;Arnold 1997). Finally, these data did not include the ¢tness of F 1 hybrids grown in natural environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, pre-pollination mechanisms, including di¡erences in £owering time and £oral morphology that result in di¡erential pollinator speci¢-city, have often been thought to be among the most important barriers to gene exchange between plants (Levin 1978;Grant 1981;Schemske & Bradshaw 1999) and these were not included in this study. In addition, the pollinations from which these data came were conducted without pollen competition, although in natural conditions pollen competition may be important in determining the probability of hybrid formation (Emms et al 1996;Arnold 1997). Finally, these data did not include the ¢tness of F 1 hybrids grown in natural environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actual patterns of introgression in hybrid zone populations of Louisiana Iris species are affected by a complex cascade of factors. These include ecological setting, timing of flowering, floral traits, pollinator behavior, gamete competition, and hybrid viability and fertility Carney et al 1994;Emms et al 1996;Burke et al 1998;Emms and Arnold 2000;Wesselingh and Arnold 2000;Johnston et al 2001aJohnston et al , 2003. Since all these factors interact, genetic covariance between numerous traits might be important in preventing or facilitating gene flow between I. fulva and I. brevicaulis in natural settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the barriers to hybridization are fundamentally different in these two systems. In Iris, interspecific pollen-tube competition and differential pollen tube growth appear to provide a strong barrier to F 1 hybrid formation and determine the direction asymmetry in hybridization (Carney et al 1996;Emms et al 1996). In Asclepias, F 1 formation appears to be limited by pollinators specializing on each milkweed species, whereas postpollination pollentube competition appears less important (Broyles et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%