2017
DOI: 10.17129/botsci.1022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollination biology of <em>Agave horrida</em> (Agavaceae) in the Chichinautzin mountain range, in Central Mexico”

Abstract: Background: the predictability of nectarivorous bats and their greater fecundity efficiency promote specialized pollination systems in columnar cactus in central Mexico. Some authors have suggested the same pollination pattern for Agave genus, and even when recent meta-analysis does not find such pattern, they have suggested this could be due to the lack of descriptive studies of pollination for this genus. Hypothesis: according to the chiropterophily syndrome of its flowers, the most efficient pollinator of A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When an Agave taxon had a small (nested) distribution within a bat distribution, the geographic correlation value was not significant; however, this is not evidence that the interaction is not happening. Many studies have reported the primary role that nectar‐feeding bats play in the pollination of Agave (Álvarez and González‐Quintero, 1970; Easterla, 1972; Howell, 1979; Howell and Hart, 1980; Howell and Roth, 1981; Arizaga et al, 2000; Molina‐Freaner and Eguiarte, 2003; Scott, 2004; Rocha et al, 2005; Sánchez and Medellin, 2007; Trejo, 2013; Flores‐Torres and Galindo‐Escamilla, 2017). For this reason, we believe that as a product of the strict methodology and considering the cases of disparity in the area sizes, the interaction events may have been underestimated in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When an Agave taxon had a small (nested) distribution within a bat distribution, the geographic correlation value was not significant; however, this is not evidence that the interaction is not happening. Many studies have reported the primary role that nectar‐feeding bats play in the pollination of Agave (Álvarez and González‐Quintero, 1970; Easterla, 1972; Howell, 1979; Howell and Hart, 1980; Howell and Roth, 1981; Arizaga et al, 2000; Molina‐Freaner and Eguiarte, 2003; Scott, 2004; Rocha et al, 2005; Sánchez and Medellin, 2007; Trejo, 2013; Flores‐Torres and Galindo‐Escamilla, 2017). For this reason, we believe that as a product of the strict methodology and considering the cases of disparity in the area sizes, the interaction events may have been underestimated in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when a few Agave spp. are pollinated mainly by daytime visitors (i.e., A. toumeyana, A. parviflora, A. chrysantha, A. marmorata ), such as birds and insects (Schaffer and Schaffer, 1977; Slauson, 2000; Ornelas et al, 2002), several researchers have recorded a close ecological relationship between the genus Agave and Leptonycteris nivalis and L. yerbabuenae (Álvarez and González‐Quintero, 1970; Easterla, 1972; Howell, 1979; Howell and Hart, 1980; Howell and Roth, 1981; Arizaga et al, 2000; Molina‐Freaner and Eguiarte, 2003; Scott, 2004; Rocha et al, 2005; Sánchez and Medellin, 2007; Trejo, 2013; Flores‐Torres and Galindo‐Escamilla, 2017; Flores‐Abreu et al, 2019; Martínez, 2019). While there are several studies that address the Agave –bat interaction, these only analyze some Agave spp.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%