2009
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollinator visitation patterns strongly influence among-flower variation in selfing rate

Abstract: Striking among-flower differences in selfing rate result from increased deposition of geitonogamous (among-flower, within-display) self pollen as bumble-bees probe consecutive flowers on each floral display. The resulting heterogeneity in the genetic composition of sibships may influence seedling competition and the expression of inbreeding depression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
104
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
104
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Outcrossing rates vary widely within and among populations, and are inXuenced by population density (Karron et al 1995a, b), Xoral display size , Xoral morphology (Karron et al 1997), and the presence of competitors for pollination . Karron et al (2009) also documented striking variation in selWng rate among adjacent Xowers which reXects increased deposition of geitonogamous (among-Xower, within-display) self pollen as bumble bees probe consecutive Xowers on a Xoral display.…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Outcrossing rates vary widely within and among populations, and are inXuenced by population density (Karron et al 1995a, b), Xoral display size , Xoral morphology (Karron et al 1997), and the presence of competitors for pollination . Karron et al (2009) also documented striking variation in selWng rate among adjacent Xowers which reXects increased deposition of geitonogamous (among-Xower, within-display) self pollen as bumble bees probe consecutive Xowers on a Xoral display.…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Likewise, although many studies show that insect pollination declines in fragmented populations (Aizen and Feinsinger, 1994), there are cases showing long distance pollination by small insects in fragmented landscapes (41 km; Dick et al, 2003;Byrne et al, 2008). Therefore, despite the expectation that selfing and pollen diversity should be a function of pollinator mobility, in line with the landscape ecology models (Charnov, 1976;Karron et al, 2009), more experimental studies into woody plant density, pollen movement and mating patterns are required to further understand these associations.…”
Section: Generality Of Habitat Fragmentation-mating Pattern Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As plant densities decline, animal pollinators are less likely to shift from one plant to another because of the increased costs of doing so-the theory of optimal foraging (Heinrich and Raven, 1972;Charnov, 1976;Ottewell et al, 2009). A pollinator foraging on a plant that is a self-compatible hermaphrodite for longer periods of time increases the probability of selfing (increases either via autogamy or geitonogamy; that is, pollination from the same or a different flower on the same plant; Karron et al, 2009). As a consequence of increased selfpollen being received, an increase in pollen discounting is expected (Barrett, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might increase the number of flowers pollinated during a single visit to an inflorescence. However, the tendency of pollinators to visit several flowers on a single plant increases opportunity of geitonogamy and self-pollination rate [32][33][34][35]. The repeated visits by various insects to our study plants to collect nectar and pollen suggests that they produced enough reward to the visitors which may enhance pollination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%