2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-012-9785-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollutant Plume Dispersion in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer over Idealized Urban Roughness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3a) [52]. For the full range of aspect ratios, it is comparable to our previous RANS calculation [53] consisting of less street canyons in a shallower vertical extent (H = 6h), as well as our previous large-Eddy simulation (LES) with idealized periodic street canyons [54]. Whereas, our LES based on an isolated street canyon [55] overpredicted the friction factor in small aspect ratio in the isolated roughness regime.…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3a) [52]. For the full range of aspect ratios, it is comparable to our previous RANS calculation [53] consisting of less street canyons in a shallower vertical extent (H = 6h), as well as our previous large-Eddy simulation (LES) with idealized periodic street canyons [54]. Whereas, our LES based on an isolated street canyon [55] overpredicted the friction factor in small aspect ratio in the isolated roughness regime.…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Instead, the PCH is only peaked at 0.5 ≤ h/b ≤ 1 in which a single recirculation is observed spinning the whole street canyon. The PCH calculated by the current RANS k-model shows a good agreement with various datasets available in literature [62][63][64] and our previous studies [36,53,54], demonstrating the reliability of our current CFD sensitivity tests.…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations