2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poly(aquachlorobis(1,10–phenanthroline)copper(II)iodidemonohydrate)/GCE for simultaneous determination of caffeine and theophylline in human serum, tea, and tablet samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of scan rate on the CV response of the bare and poly(cytosine)-based GCEs for [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3–/4– as shown in Figure , was utilized for the determination of the effective electroactive surface area employing Randles-Sevcik equation (eq ). , I p = 2.69 × 10 5 A D 1 / 2 n 3 / 2 C v 1 / 2 where I P = peak current (amperes), n = stands for the number of electrons transferred in a redox cycle, A = the electrode surface area (cm 2 ), C = molar concentration of redox-active species (mol/cm 3 ), D = the diffusion coefficient (cm 2 /s), and v = scan rate in V s –1…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influence of scan rate on the CV response of the bare and poly(cytosine)-based GCEs for [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3–/4– as shown in Figure , was utilized for the determination of the effective electroactive surface area employing Randles-Sevcik equation (eq ). , I p = 2.69 × 10 5 A D 1 / 2 n 3 / 2 C v 1 / 2 where I P = peak current (amperes), n = stands for the number of electrons transferred in a redox cycle, A = the electrode surface area (cm 2 ), C = molar concentration of redox-active species (mol/cm 3 ), D = the diffusion coefficient (cm 2 /s), and v = scan rate in V s –1…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of scan rate on the CV response of the bare and poly(cytosine)based GCEs for [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3−/4− as shown in Figure 4, was utilized for the determination of the effective electroactive surface area employing Randles-Sevcik equation (eq 1). 22,23…”
Section: Cyclic Voltammetric Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing the analytical performance of this conductometric sensor to that of the previously published sensors, the detection limit is lower than that of the potentiometric sensor [1] and of the voltammetric sensor on bare BDD [19]. Nevertheless, the voltammetric detection of caffeine in the presence of nanomaterials leads to a lower detection limit, in the range of nM [22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Analytical Performance Of the Caffeine Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several metallic oxides were used such as 3D ZnCo 2 O 4 [22], Gd 2 (MoO 4 ) 3 [23], ZnO [24], TiO 2 [25], the obtained detection limits were respectively 11.4 nM, 4.1 nM, 150 nM, 3.3 μM. Some other compounds were used for the sensitive detection of caffeine: phenantroline Cu(II) [26], Cu-MOF [27] and porphyrin [28] leading to respective detection limits 10.2 nM, 19 nM and 14.06 μM. A potentiometric sensors was also designed for the caffeine detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%