2004
DOI: 10.1002/pi.1610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poly(ethylene oxide)‐block‐polystyrene copolymers obtained by radical polymerization involving chain‐transfer processes

Abstract: Poly(ethylene oxide)‐block‐polystyrene (PEO–PSt) block copolymers were prepared by radical polymerization of styrene in the presence of iodoacetate—terminated PEO (PEO‐I) as a macromolecular chain‐transfer agent. PEO‐I was synthesized by successively converting the OH end‐group of α‐methoxy ω‐hydroxy PEO to chloroacetate and then to the iodoacetate. The chain‐transfer constant of PEO‐I was estimated from the rate of consumption of the transfer agent versus the rate of consumption of the monomer (Ctr, PEO‐I = 0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, in ITP, to obtain polymer with a narrow molar mass-distribution the rate of exchange should be higher than that of the propagation. ITP allows one to control a great variety of hydrogenated monomers, such as acrylates, styrenics, , methacrylates (by reverse iodine transfer polymerization), and vinyl acetate, and also fluorinated monomers, , such as VDF , or a mixture of fluoroolefins (VDF/HFP, , VDF/HFP/TFE, , VDF/MAF (where MAF represents α-trifluoromethacrylic acid 44 ).... Finally, ITP allows the synthesis of well-defined architectures such as monofunctional and telechelic polymers, ,, PVDF- b -poly(styrene) diblock copolymer, and PVDF- g -PS graft copolymer …”
Section: Results and Discusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, in ITP, to obtain polymer with a narrow molar mass-distribution the rate of exchange should be higher than that of the propagation. ITP allows one to control a great variety of hydrogenated monomers, such as acrylates, styrenics, , methacrylates (by reverse iodine transfer polymerization), and vinyl acetate, and also fluorinated monomers, , such as VDF , or a mixture of fluoroolefins (VDF/HFP, , VDF/HFP/TFE, , VDF/MAF (where MAF represents α-trifluoromethacrylic acid 44 ).... Finally, ITP allows the synthesis of well-defined architectures such as monofunctional and telechelic polymers, ,, PVDF- b -poly(styrene) diblock copolymer, and PVDF- g -PS graft copolymer …”
Section: Results and Discusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike fluorinated CTAs, most nonfluorinated transfer agents 15,18,19,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] are rather easy to synthesize and their chemical structure enables an easy transfer of the iodine atom to the propagating polymer chain while the resulting radical is stabilized by either inductive/polar or resonance effects. Such reasons, their low price, their solubility in organic solvents, and the good control results make them an obvious choice for many different applications (Table 1).…”
Section: Nucleophilic Substitutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(B1 and B2) gave the monomodal peaks, and the low PDIs (<1.05) of PS‐ b ‐PEO copolymers proved that the ROP of EO monomers initiated by the co‐initiation system of PS‐OH and DPMK was well controlled. The molecular weight of PS‐ b ‐PEO copolymers determined by SEC using THF as eluent was unreliable because THF was not a good solvent for the PEO segment and the PS‐ b ‐PEO might be aggregated into micellar structures by self‐association in THF solvent . Alternatively, the most reliable method to determine the actual molar mass of PS‐ b ‐PEO copolymers was the 1 H NMR spectrum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%