2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2021.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pólya group in some real biquadratic fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If there exist infinitely many pairs of consecutive integers with the same number of prime factors appearing in odd exponents, then by using Proposition 2.1 we would be able to conclude that the answer to Question 6.2 is also 0. For example, the pairs of integers (21,22), (33,34), (34,35), (38,39) and possibly more are admissible choice for such consecutive pairs. In view of this, we ask the following question, an affirmative answer to which will resolve Question 6.2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there exist infinitely many pairs of consecutive integers with the same number of prime factors appearing in odd exponents, then by using Proposition 2.1 we would be able to conclude that the answer to Question 6.2 is also 0. For example, the pairs of integers (21,22), (33,34), (34,35), (38,39) and possibly more are admissible choice for such consecutive pairs. In view of this, we ask the following question, an affirmative answer to which will resolve Question 6.2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aim to relativize the above result of Hilbert for general number fields and for that we need to introduce the notion of relative Pólya groups (recently defined independently in [6] and [15], as a generalization of Pólya groups): Definition 1.6. Let L/E be a finite extension of number fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main goal of this paper is to generalize this result to the relative setting. The Pólya group has been relativized as follows [3,6]: Definition 1.3. Let L/K be a finite extension of number fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%