2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyamide membrane surface and bulk modification using humid environment as a new heat curing medium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristic peaks of PA top layer at 1550, 1610, and 1660 cm −1 are observed in the spectra of the TFC membranes, confirming that the PA layer has been well formed on top of the PSf layer . On the other hand, the peak at 1730 cm −1 in the spectra of membranes C2 and T2 which represents the hydrolysis of some of the TMC acyl chloride groups to carboxylic acid groups cannot be observed in the spectrum of membrane C1 . The crosslinking degree of PA layers can be estimated by comparing the absorption intensity ratio of the bands at 1666 cm −1 (amide I) and 1730 cm −1 (carboxylic CO) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The characteristic peaks of PA top layer at 1550, 1610, and 1660 cm −1 are observed in the spectra of the TFC membranes, confirming that the PA layer has been well formed on top of the PSf layer . On the other hand, the peak at 1730 cm −1 in the spectra of membranes C2 and T2 which represents the hydrolysis of some of the TMC acyl chloride groups to carboxylic acid groups cannot be observed in the spectrum of membrane C1 . The crosslinking degree of PA layers can be estimated by comparing the absorption intensity ratio of the bands at 1666 cm −1 (amide I) and 1730 cm −1 (carboxylic CO) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…ATR‐FTIR spectra of these membranes, in the range of 1000–4000 cm −1 (Figure 4) and 1300–1700 cm −1 (Figure 4(b)), for the sake of clarification, show characteristic peaks at 1546, corresponding to NH (amide II), 1627, attributed to CO stretching (amide I) for NCHO and 3364 cm −1 , emanating from amine group (NH, NH 2 ) and carboxylic acid (COOH) which can be ascribed to the PA layers atop the PSf substrates 8,21,22 . Moreover, it can be inferred from the peaks appeared at 1742 cm −1 that some of the TMC acyl chlorides were hydrolyzed to carboxylic acid groups 23 . The hydrolysis could result in incomplete reactions between TMC and TETA monomers during IP and finally in a decrease in cross‐linking densities of the PA layers 7,10 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of cross‐linking of the PA layers estimated from the ATR‐FTIR spectra. The estimated cross‐linking densities on the basis of ATR‐FTIR would be even more reliable than those usually derived from X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis 13,23 . Table 4 lists the ratios of absorption intensities of the bands at 1627 cm −1 (amide I) and 1742 cm −1 (carboxylic CO) which are measures of the cross‐linking degree of the top layer 24 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence mechanism of the heat-curing method on the formation processes of interfacially polymerized PA active layer on electrospun nanofiber support was deducted based on the experimental results mentioned above. Figure 11 illustrated the speculative formation process of PA active layers via interfacial polymerization of MPD in DI water with TMC in hexane using different heat-curing methods (curing in the hot-air oven and on hot water bath), which referred to the discussion in the literature [ 44 ]. PAN nanofiber exhibited good hydrophilicity with swelling behavior, which could first absorb an aqueous solution into the bulk or voids of the nanofiber support.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhan et al Ghosh et al, and Han et al respectively investigated the effects of curing conditions (temperature, time) on the morphologies and performances of the as-prepared PA-TFC membranes in nanofiltration (oven-curing), reverse osmosis (oven-curing) and FO (specific hot-water-curing) [ 40 , 41 , 42 ]. In addition, several studies demonstrated that conducting different heat-curing methods would make a significant difference in surface morphologies, physicochemical properties and separation performances of reverse osmosis membranes [ 43 , 44 ]. However, as almost all related studies were based on the phase-inversion support, none are on the electrospun nanofiber support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%