2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5097079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyaniline/Co–Cu ferrite nanocomposites for electromagnetic interference shielding in X-band

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest shielding effectiveness value showed up to 35.1dB for the composites with a 20 wt% concentration of CoCuFe 2 O 4 in X-band frequency of 8–12 GHz range with a minimum thickness of 2.2 mm. 142…”
Section: Polyaniline (Pani)-based Emi Shielding Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The highest shielding effectiveness value showed up to 35.1dB for the composites with a 20 wt% concentration of CoCuFe 2 O 4 in X-band frequency of 8–12 GHz range with a minimum thickness of 2.2 mm. 142…”
Section: Polyaniline (Pani)-based Emi Shielding Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest shielding effectiveness value showed up to 35.1dB for the composites with a 20 wt% concentration of CoCuFe 2 O 4 in X-band frequency of 8-12 GHz range with a minimum thickness of 2.2 mm. 142 In another work, Hosseini et al prepared conductive polyaniline (PANI) and with core-shell structure of manganese ferrite (MnFe 2 O 4 ) nanocomposites through in situ polymerization in the presence of an oxidant such as ammonium persulfate (APS)and a surfactant or dopant such as dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid (DBSA). Negatively charged core nanoparticles were synthesized through the emulsion polymerization technique.…”
Section: Polyaniline Ferrites-based Nanocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…355,356 Their choice is mainly guided by their low cost, low density, high stability, saturation magnetization, permeability, resistivity, dielectric constant, adequate magnetic properties, and corrosion resistance as compared to metals and carbon. 357 Graphene nanosheets/RGO–NiFe 2 O 4 /cyanate ester composites prepared by the solution blending method exhibited a total EMI SE of ∼50 dB over X-bands with thicknesses of ∼2.7 mm following absorption as the dominant shielding mechanism. 358 The EMI shielding performance was found to follow absorption as a dominant shielding mechanism.…”
Section: Magnetic Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Studies were conducted on several nanomaterials, such as ferromagnetic element nanoalloys, metal oxides, ferrites and their polymers and ICP-based nanocomposites in EMI shielding applications. 276–405 The choice of magnetic materials-filled ICP nanocomposites in EMI shielding applications is mainly guided by the dielectric loss, magnetic loss and impedance matching of the component(s) of the material(s) under investigation. It provides a combination of magnetic nanoparticles and ICPs that account for its additionally reduced weight, cost, enhanced flexibility and corrosion resistance, tuneability conductivity and tailorable permeability.…”
Section: Magnetic Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 shows a comparison with the state of the recent published literature dealing with the electromagnetic interference with different shielding materials. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] The electromagnetic shielding effectiveness (ESE) can be expressed as: ESE ¼ 10 log…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetry (Dsc)mentioning
confidence: 99%