Polycentric Exoprosthetic Knee Joints – Extent of Shortening During Swing Phase

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An often assumed advantage of polycentric knee joints compared to monocentric ones is the improved ground clearance during swing phase due to the geometric shortening of the lower leg segment (LLS).
 OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether polycentric knee joints considerably improve ground clearance and to evaluate the influence of prosthetic alignment on the extent of ground clearance.
 METHODOLOGY: 11 polycentric and 2 monocentric knee joints were attached to a rigid, stationary testing device. Shortening of the LLS and the resulting ground clearance during knee flexion were measured. Prosthetic components were mounted at the same height and the anterior-posterior position was in accordance with the manufacturer's alignment recommendations.
 FINDINGS: Shortening of up to 14.7 (SD=0.0) mm at the instance of minimal ground clearance during swing phase was measured. One knee joint elongated by 4.4 (SD=0.0) mm. Measurements of the ground clearance demonstrated differences up to 25.4 (SD=0.0) mm. One monocentric knee joint provided more ground clearance when compared to 8 of the polycentric knee joints investigated. 
 CONCLUSION: Only some polycentric knee joints shorten appreciably during swing phase. With an optimized prosthetic alignment and a well-designed swing phase control, a monocentric knee joint may generate greater ground clearance compared to a polycentric knee joint.
 LAYMAN’S ABSTRACT 
 Tripping is a safety risk for amputees and it is mainly affected by ground clearance during swing phase. An often assumed advantage of polycentric knee joints compared to monocentric ones is the improved ground clearance during swing phase due to the geometric shortening of the lower leg segment (LLS). Based on this statement safety benefits for above knee-amputees due to reduced danger of stumbling are discussed commonly for the entire group of polycentric knee joints. We believe that this statement is not true for all polycentric knee joint designs. Therefore, we analyzed 11 polycentric and two monocentric knee joints in a rigid, stationary testing device with their individual prosthetic alignments according to the manufacturer’s alignment recommendations. Shortening of the LLS and the resulting ground clearance during knee flexion were measured. The results showed shortening effects of up to 15 mm. One knee joint elongated by 4 mm. One monocentric knee joint provided more ground clearance when compared to 8 of the polycentric knee joints investigated. We conclude, that only some polycentric knee joints shorten appreciably during swing phase. With an optimized prosthetic alignment a monocentric knee joint may generate greater ground clearance compared to a polycentric knee joint.
 Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/33768/26547
 How To Cite: Köhler T.M, Bellmann M, Blumentritt S. Polycentric Exoprosthetic Knee Joints – Extent of Shortening during Swing Phase. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2020;Volume3, Issue1, No.5. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v3i1.33768
 Corresponding Author: Thomas Maximilian Köhler, MScOttobock: Hermann-Rein-Straße 2a, 37075, Göttingen.E-mail: thomasmaximilian.koehler@ottobock.deORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-121X

A passive dorsiflexing ankle prosthesis to increase minimum foot clearance during swing

“…MFC is a result of the configuration of the hip, knee, and ankle joints during the swing phase of gait (Sensinger et al, 2013. One strategy for increasing MFC is to design prosthetic knees and/or ankles that adopt a flexed configuration during swing (Bellmann et al, 2010;Sensinger et al, 2013;Lura et al, 2015;Köhler et al, 2020;Quraishi et al, 2021;Bartlett et al, 2022a), thereby increasing the clearance between the foot and ground. When comparing interventions targeted at both joints, however, ankle dorsiflexion has been shown to be a more effective strategy due to the high sensitivity of MFC to changes in ankle angle at the instant of minimum clearance (Moosabhoy and Gard, 2006;Sensinger et al, 2013. As a result, a variety of prosthetic ankles have been developed to promote swing phase dorsiflexion in both industry and academia.…”

Design and Validation of a Polycentric Hybrid Knee Prosthesis With Electromagnet-Controlled Mode Transition

“…lightweight and durable structure [2]. Most commercial mechanical passive knees use a hydraulic or pneumatic cylinder to conduct a smooth swing and stable stance [3]. In addition, microprocessor-controlled passive knee prostheses like the Ottobock ® C-leg and Ossur ® Rheo Knee can intelligently adjust the damping in a gait, allowing them to perform well in a wide range of users and environments [4,5].…”