2003
DOI: 10.1109/jmems.2002.805051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polycrystalline silicon-germanium films for integrated microsystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…62 This explains the difference in the Q-factor for poly Ge MEMS devices given above. 61 Although large Q factors are required for resonators, for a stable platform, a low Q-factor is required. A low Q-factor will help isolate the devices placed on the platform from external noise and vibrations, so that their electrical/optical/mechanical properties remain stable.…”
Section: Membrane Vibrational Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…62 This explains the difference in the Q-factor for poly Ge MEMS devices given above. 61 Although large Q factors are required for resonators, for a stable platform, a low Q-factor is required. A low Q-factor will help isolate the devices placed on the platform from external noise and vibrations, so that their electrical/optical/mechanical properties remain stable.…”
Section: Membrane Vibrational Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured Q-factors are lower than the reported membrane behavior for poly Ge and Si in vacuum, but have similar Q values at atmospheric pressure. 61,64 This is because at atmospheric pressure, the limit on Q factor values is determined by damping due to the air, while in vacuum damping is governed by different mechanisms such as clamping losses, thermoelastic and phonon-phonon interactions, as well as losses at the internal defects in the films. In the case of the studied membrane which has relatively low Q factors, high crystalline quality, and low tensile stress (good matching between the FIG.…”
Section: Fig 8 Experimental Arrangementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T.-C. Nguyen, "Integrated micromechanical circuits for RF front ends," Proceedings of the 36 th European Solid-State Device Research Conference, Montreux, Switzerland, Sept. 19-21, 2006, pp. 7-16. Although the use of tungsten instead of the more conventional copper and aluminum prevents the process of [15] from widespread use, other variants of this modular process have now been demonstrated that allow more conventional CMOS metals [16]. In addition, other non-modular merging processes [17] have already been used in integrated MEMS products for many years now.…”
Section: Mems Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, however, on-chip vibrating micromechanical resonators based on MEMS technology have become increasingly attractive as onchip frequency selective elements for communication-grade oscillators and filters, spurred by demonstrations of Q's > 145,780 at 60 MHz [1], frequency temperature dependencies of only 18 ppm over 25-105°C at 10 MHz [2], and by a potential for single-chip integration with transistors [3]. A recent reference oscillator using an SOI-based vibrating micromechanical resonator [4] has, in fact, already satisfied the GSM specification (-130 dBc/Hz and -150 dBc/Hz at 1 kHz and farfrom-carrier offsets, respectively, from a 13 MHz carrier).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oscillators employing surface-micromachined resonator tanks, however, encumbered by a smaller power handling ability, do not quite yet satisfy GSM specs [1] over all carrier offsets. Between SOI-and surface-micromachining, the latter is perhaps more attractive, since it avoids high-aspect ratios and has a more successful planar integration history [3] [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%