“…It was also suggested that Xanthomonadales and Pseudomonadales in the soil exhibited weaker BPA degrading activity than strain AO1. Indeed, some bacter i a l s t r a i n s , b e l o n g i n g t o X a n t h o m o n a d a l e s , Pseudomonadales, Burkholderiales, Caulobacterales and Enterobacteriaceae, have already been reported as degradative bacterium against aromatic compounds, phenolic compounds or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Ammar et al, 2005Chatterjee and Bourquin, 1987Gutierrez et al, 2013Haritash and Kaushik, 2009O Sullivan and Mahenthiralingam, 2005 Furthermore, our results indicated that BPA purification by strain AO1 and the soil bacteria improved or re s t o re d t h e b a c t e r i a l d i v e r s i t y, f o r e x a m p l e , Be taproteobacteria, except Burkholderiales, were reduced in BPA polluted soil after 7 days without strain AO1 but were restored at day 50, and unclassified bacteria were also reduced after 7 days in the BPA polluted soil with strain AO1 but were restored at day 14 FIG.5 . It was also observed that strain AO1 was only detectable in the BPA polluted soil but not in the purified soil, based upon the Southern hybridization method using the bisdB gene probe data not shown , which encoded a BPA degradation enzyme in strain AO1 Sasaki et al, 2008 , suggesting that strain AO1 might not lead to a heavy burden in the soil environment.…”