1984
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1984.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polygene polymorphism affecting wing vein formation in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract: SUMMARYOne hundred isofemale lines originating from the same (Oklahoma) wild population of Drosophila melanogaster were assayed for cryptic variation capable of producing gaps in wing vein L5 in flies heterozygous for genomes from an enhanced veinlet line.There were very significant differences between isofemale lines, and the Oklahoma population was clearly polymorphic for vein-gap genes of subthreshold expression. Many of the isofemale lines were also segregating for such genes.There were no obvious relation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed similar selection with mutations in rhomboid (rho ve-1 ) and net (net 1 ) genes. Mutations with similar phenotypic consequences are present in low frequencies in natural populations (33) and previous selection experiments with these have produced rapid phenotypic response by artificial selection (24,(36)(37)(38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed similar selection with mutations in rhomboid (rho ve-1 ) and net (net 1 ) genes. Mutations with similar phenotypic consequences are present in low frequencies in natural populations (33) and previous selection experiments with these have produced rapid phenotypic response by artificial selection (24,(36)(37)(38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of modifiers of mutant expression with respect to phenomena such as evolution of dominance (see Sved and Mayo, 1970), canalization and development (Rendel, 1979;Thompson and Woodruff, 1982) and mimicry (Turner, 1977) has been widely discussed. Nowadays, however, there is very little information about the extent of genetic variation for modifiers of mutant expression in natural populations although some efforts have been addressed to this subject (Alvarez et a!., 1980;Thoday and Thompson, 1984;Thompson and Spivey, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%