2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27598-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polygenic contribution to the relationship of loneliness and social isolation with schizophrenia

Abstract: Previous research suggests an association of loneliness and social isolation (LNL-ISO) with schizophrenia. Here, we demonstrate a LNL-ISO polygenic score contribution to schizophrenia risk in an independent case-control sample (N = 3,488). We then subset schizophrenia predisposing variation based on its effect on LNL-ISO. We find that genetic variation with concordant effects in both phenotypes shows significant SNP-based heritability enrichment, higher polygenic contribution in females, and positive covarianc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
7
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(126 reference statements)
4
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unexpectedly, when controlling for childhood maltreatment, we observed no relationship between loneliness/isolation and schizophrenia. This finding contradicts previous research, which reports a positive—and potentially causal—association between the two traits (Andreu-Bernabeu et al, 2022; Boyda & McFeeters, 2015; Steenkamp et al, 2022). The discrepancy in findings may be driven by differences in the type of data analyzed (i.e., genetic instead of phenotypic), the type of mediator used (e.g., loneliness/isolation as opposed to difficulties in social engagement), and/or the choice of covariates (i.e., controlling for childhood maltreatment or not).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Unexpectedly, when controlling for childhood maltreatment, we observed no relationship between loneliness/isolation and schizophrenia. This finding contradicts previous research, which reports a positive—and potentially causal—association between the two traits (Andreu-Bernabeu et al, 2022; Boyda & McFeeters, 2015; Steenkamp et al, 2022). The discrepancy in findings may be driven by differences in the type of data analyzed (i.e., genetic instead of phenotypic), the type of mediator used (e.g., loneliness/isolation as opposed to difficulties in social engagement), and/or the choice of covariates (i.e., controlling for childhood maltreatment or not).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with recent research suggesting that genetic liability to higher EA could affect health and social outcomes independently of educational milestones or changes in wages 46. A combined liability-threshold model which includes putative rare variants with large effects59 and involves potential gene–environmental interaction effects such as the stigma and discrimination associated with some diagnostic categories,60 the disability associated with early symptoms and drug abuse,51 61 the potential impact of isolation and social defeat62 63 and a likely negative expectation effect towards SMD such as SCZ,64 could provide more accurate estimates in the future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…There did not exist a profile that had elevated loneliness but low symptoms. Together with evidence that loneliness is associated with emotional instability and hypervigilance to social threats, which predispose the development of affective and psychotic disorders [e.g., ( 8 , 21 , 65 )], and that there are polygenetic overlaps between loneliness with these disorders ( 66 , 67 ), the current findings lend support to the idea that loneliness may be a general risk factor that pertains to various psychopathologies ( 68 , 69 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%