2017
DOI: 10.1002/ana.25029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polygenic hazard scores in preclinical Alzheimer disease

Abstract: Identifying asymptomatic older individuals at elevated risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is of clinical importance. Among 1,081 asymptomatic older adults, a recently validated polygenic hazard score (PHS) significantly predicted time to AD dementia and steeper longitudinal cognitive decline, even after controlling for APOE ε4 carrier status. Older individuals in the highest PHS percentiles showed the highest AD incidence rates. PHS predicted longitudinal clinical decline among older individuals with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, we investigated the clinical utility of PHS for individual assessment of risk for clinical progression to AD over time among older individuals with MCI, a critical question for most patients admitted to memory clinics. Whereas prior work from our group has shown the value of PHS for predicting AD-associated clinical and cognitive decline among non-demented elderly individuals (Tan et al, 2017 ), a critical next step in assessing the potential clinical utility of PHS is to examine the extent to which PHS provides independent information beyond other commonly used predictors, such as brain atrophy levels and baseline cognitive function, and to determine whether combinations of these measures improve prediction of clinical decline and progression to dementia. To this end, we used survival analyses (Klein et al, 2013 ) to compare single-, two-, and three-factor models of PHS, atrophy score, and MMSE for prediction of time to progression from MCI to AD over 120 months of follow-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In the current study, we investigated the clinical utility of PHS for individual assessment of risk for clinical progression to AD over time among older individuals with MCI, a critical question for most patients admitted to memory clinics. Whereas prior work from our group has shown the value of PHS for predicting AD-associated clinical and cognitive decline among non-demented elderly individuals (Tan et al, 2017 ), a critical next step in assessing the potential clinical utility of PHS is to examine the extent to which PHS provides independent information beyond other commonly used predictors, such as brain atrophy levels and baseline cognitive function, and to determine whether combinations of these measures improve prediction of clinical decline and progression to dementia. To this end, we used survival analyses (Klein et al, 2013 ) to compare single-, two-, and three-factor models of PHS, atrophy score, and MMSE for prediction of time to progression from MCI to AD over 120 months of follow-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We resolved ‘ties’ using the Breslow method. We covaried for sex, education, APOE ε4 status, age at baseline, and also age at baseline stratified into quintiles to adjust for violations of Cox proportional hazards assumptions by baseline age [27]. We restricted survival analyses, which involves AD dementia censoring, as well as the PPV/NPV analyses (see above) to the combined CN and MCI groups only as the CN individuals had low conversion rates during the observation period (< 5%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, PHS was associated with in vivo biomarkers of AD pathology such as reduced CSF Aβ 1–42 and elevated CSF total tau across the AD spectrum (in older controls, MCI and AD dementia individuals). Further, using a large prospective clinical cohort, we have recently shown that PHS predicts time to AD dementia and longitudinal multi-domain cognitive decline in cognitively normal older (CN) individuals and in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) [27]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PRS has also been used to detect individuals at greater risk for developing AD, and proved to be successful, even in those individuals that were noncarriers of the APOE ε4 allele. The PRS predicted longitudinal clinical decline in older individuals that showed moderate to high depositions of amyloid beta and or tau [62] and in clinically diagnosed AD individuals [63]. Moreover, the AD PRS was found to predict the level and rate of memory loss in a sample of non-Hispanic whites from the Health and Retirement Study [64] and in the ADNI (Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative) cohort [65].…”
Section: Genetic Overlap Within Characteristics Of the Same Diseasementioning
confidence: 98%