1958
DOI: 10.1016/0016-0032(58)90665-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polygonal action in chain drives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When θ 3 is neglected in the above expression, the result agrees with existing approximate result [7]. Note here, that the driver velocity may vary, i.e.…”
Section: Angular Velocitysupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When θ 3 is neglected in the above expression, the result agrees with existing approximate result [7]. Note here, that the driver velocity may vary, i.e.…”
Section: Angular Velocitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The dynamics of the driven sprocket was considered by Mahalingam [7], who expressed the tension variation of the chain span due to polygonal action using the first harmonic term of a Fourier approximation. With this approximation, the driven sprocket is subjected to monofrequency forced vibration and high-frequency components originating from impact loading and discontinuity are unaccounted for.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the review [19]. The study of sprocket and chain span motion introduced in [20,21] and subsequent studies [22] are based on the assumption that the driven sprocket angular velocity varies time-harmonically at the tooth frequency, due to the excitation coming from the variable velocity ratio between driver and driven sprocket. Comprehensive models are derived for belt drives [23] and engine timing chain drives [24], with non-linear transverse and longitudinal motion of the chain spans coupled to the displacements of pulleys/sprockets with flexible supports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For earlier work, see e.g. [2,9]. The main reason for this situation is that the dynamic behavior is very complex, making it impossible to find general analytical procedures able to describe the problem thoroughly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%