2003
DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/14/1/305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyimide-based intracortical neural implant with improved structural stiffness

Abstract: A novel structure for chronically implantable cortical electrodes using polyimide bio-polymer was devised, which provides both flexibility for micro-motion compliance between brain tissues and the skull and at the brain/implant interface and stiffness for better surgical handling. A 5–10 µm thick silicon backbone layer was attached to the tip of the electrode to enhance the structural stiffness. This stiff segment was then followed by a 1 mm flexible segment without a silicon backbone layer. The fabricated imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
123
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
123
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Neural interfaces using SiO 2 and Si 3 N 4 have shown gliosis also, but polyimide, a chemically resistive polymer material has shown excellent biocompatibility (Boppart et al, 1992;Rousche et al, 2001). Although this material offers excellent biocompatibility, displaying a fibroblast adherence, growth, and spread comparable to polystyrene, it has major drawbacks that hinder its acceptance as the material of choice for NI devices (Lee, K. K. et al, 2004). The material has a relatively high water uptake which decreases electrical impedance, and it is a very flexible material which add complications during NI implantation (Polikov et al, 2005).…”
Section: Neuronal Cellular Interactions With Opaque Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural interfaces using SiO 2 and Si 3 N 4 have shown gliosis also, but polyimide, a chemically resistive polymer material has shown excellent biocompatibility (Boppart et al, 1992;Rousche et al, 2001). Although this material offers excellent biocompatibility, displaying a fibroblast adherence, growth, and spread comparable to polystyrene, it has major drawbacks that hinder its acceptance as the material of choice for NI devices (Lee, K. K. et al, 2004). The material has a relatively high water uptake which decreases electrical impedance, and it is a very flexible material which add complications during NI implantation (Polikov et al, 2005).…”
Section: Neuronal Cellular Interactions With Opaque Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One class of designs modifies the polymer probe geometry to increase stiffness in certain sections or axes while maintaining compliance in other parts. This has been accomplished by incorporating ribs or layers of other materials 9,10 . Another approach integrates a 3-D channel into the polymer probe design that is filled with biodegradable material 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this negates the flexibility originally intended for the polymer probe. More complicated designs modify the polymer probe geometry to incorporate ribs or layers of other materials such that the device has increased stiffness in certain sections or axes, while maintaining compliance in other parts [10,11]. Yet another approach integrates a 3-D channel into the polymer probe design that is filled with biodegradable material [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%