2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyisobutene/polystyrene interpenetrating polymer networks: Effects of network formation order and composition on the IPN architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 indicates, as expected,4, 26, 27 increasing the percentage of PMMA caused a reduction in tan δ max of the NR component. As the height of the tan δ peak reflects the relative quantities of each component present in such composites, this reduction can be primarily attributed to the reduction in rubber content 28, 29.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 indicates, as expected,4, 26, 27 increasing the percentage of PMMA caused a reduction in tan δ max of the NR component. As the height of the tan δ peak reflects the relative quantities of each component present in such composites, this reduction can be primarily attributed to the reduction in rubber content 28, 29.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…[24][25][26] A shift of 4 C has also been observed in the NR T g transition in PMMA radiation grafted NR, 26 suggesting that the grafting of PMMA to NR will result in an increase of the NR T g . Figure 1 indicates, as expected, 4,26,27 increasing the percentage of PMMA caused a reduction in tan d max of the NR component. As the height of the tan d peak reflects the relative quantities of each component present in such composites, this reduction can be primarily attributed to the reduction in rubber content.…”
Section: Dynamic Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Different examples can be given: acrylate/epoxide, (e.g., hexanediol diacrylate (HDDA)/3,4-epoxycyclohexylmethyl-3'4' epoxycyclohexyl carboxylate (EPOX)), trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA)/EPOX, TMPTA/diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A based epoxy resin EP, TMPTA/tri(ethylene glycol) divinyl ether (DVE-3), TMPTA/4-cyclo-hexane dimethanol divinyl ether (CHVE), fluorinated acrylate/epoxide, vinylether/acrylate, vinylether/maleate, vinylether/maleimide or oxetane/acrylate blends, (see e.g., in [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]) anthracene-labeled polystyrene/methyl methacrylate MMA/ethylene glycol dimethacrylate [36], polyisobutene/polystyrene [37], polyacrylate/polybenzoxazine [38], acrylic/liquid crystals [39,40], 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate/N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone [41], polyurethane/poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) [42], calcium alginate/dextran-HEMA [43].…”
Section: Monomers For the Manufacture Of Ipns Through Photopolymerizamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate constant for the PU formation between HTPB and IPDI was obtained from the slope of the straight line by plotting the P/(1 − P) versus time according to the following equation [26]:…”
Section: Determination Of the Reaction Rate Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where PNCO represents the conversion of isocyanate groups, C represents the absorbance values at 2260 cm −1 /1640 cm −1 in the FT-IR spectra, and the subscripts of 0 and t denote reaction times. The rate constant for the PU formation between HTPB and IPDI was obtained from the slope of the straight line by plotting the P/(1 − P) versus time according to the following equation [26]:…”
Section: Determination Of the Reaction Rate Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%